New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FastCGI review #6693
Labels
Comments
sbordet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 2, 2021
- Removed code supporting multiplex in the client. - Removed code supporting multiplex in the server. - Reworked the server-side processing of a request, now more similar to HTTP/1.1. - Improved javadocs. Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
sbordet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 2, 2021
Fixed javadocs. Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
sbordet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 3, 2021
Updates after review. Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
sbordet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 6, 2021
Updates after review. Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
sbordet
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 7, 2021
* Fixes #6693 - FastCGI review - Removed code supporting multiplex in the client. - Removed code supporting multiplex in the server. - Reworked the server-side processing of a request, now more similar to HTTP/1.1. - Improved javadocs. Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Target Jetty version(s)
10.0.x
Enhancement Description
In Jetty 10, FastCGI has been minimally updated to drop the support for multiplexing (#2095), as the protocol itself does not support it right, and in practice this feature is never used.
However, a lot of code that was handling multiplexing was left there.
The client is more inefficient and the server produces race conditions such as those reported in e.g. #6217.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: