[EasyMock 3.5] Reporting when mock fails

[nmwael]

Hi

This could be an improvement or possible an existing feature? We've searched up and down, but only found one way to do this..

When a mock fails this is output:

java.lang.AssertionError:
Unexpected method call readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "INITIALIZING"):
readOnlyAllInOneService.getKeySetup("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER"): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 0

We would like more information like this

java.lang.AssertionError:
Unexpected method call readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "INITIALIZING"):
readOnlyAllInOneService.getFlowSettingFromParameterName("159159", "ano", "size"): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getKeySetup("159159", "LOGINUSER"): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getFlowSetting("159159", "promptURL"): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getKeySetup("159159", "LOGINUSER"): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPromptsForRetry("159159", "LOGINUSER", "TERMINATOR", 2 (int)): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "LOGINUSER", "Valid"): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getKeySetup("159159", "LOGINCODE"): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPromptsForRetry("159159", "LOGINCODE", "TERMINATOR", 1 (int)): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPromptsForRetry("159159", "LOGINCODE", "TERMINATOR", 2 (int)): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getKeySetup("159159", "LOGINCODE"): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
mqConnection.request(matches(".T020."), 566 (int)): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "*", "ReturCode050ReasonCode014"): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getKeySetup("159159", "LOGINUSER"): expected: 1, actual: 1
CallData.getKeyEntered(): expected: 1, actual: 1
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "Valid"): expected: 1, actual: 0
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "transfer"): expected: 1, actual: 0
readOnlyAllInOneService.getPrompts("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "transfer_NOT_LOGIN"): expected: 1, actual: 0
readOnlyAllInOneService.getFlowSettingFromParameterName("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "defaultTransferNumber"): expected: 1, actual: 0
readOnlyAllInOneService.getFlowSettingFromParameterName("159159", "PERSONAL_ADVISER", "DefaultGroup"): expected: 1, actual: 0

Only way we found todo this are like so

Set break point in class org.easymock.internal.MocksBehavior

https://github.com/easymock/easymock/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/easymock/internal/MocksBehavior.java#L132

Method
public final Result addActual(Invocation actual) {

this line (132)
for (int i = initialPosition; i <= endPosition; i++) {

Change to initialPosition = 0
Cange to endPosition = behaviorLists.size()-1

Are there any way to setup reporting for easy mock todo so?

A nice way would be to be able to output something like this (No idea of the implementation it requires) Where all mocks would be listed for each test

[henri-tremblay]

I'm not sure I get what you are asking? In case of an unexpected call, you would like to see all the currently expected calls in the error message?

[nmwael]

Yes. :)

…

On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:32 AM Henri Tremblay ***@***.***> wrote: I'm not sure I get what you are asking? In case of an unexpected call, you would like to see all the currently expected calls in the error message? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#219 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAu397V_XPCg0AtJXvO_kYiC_YZtFvKqks5uBvFngaJpZM4U65x8> .

-- Best regards / Med venlig hilsen Nino Martinez

[nmwael]

in short yes.:)

[michael-houmaark]

Yes, that would be a really nice feature
Any new update ???

[henri-tremblay]

It's probably possible. However, the EasyMock development bandwidth is quite limited these days. So I don't know when it will come out.