Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set target compatibility to Java 8 #476

Closed
dkocher opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Set target compatibility to Java 8 #476

dkocher opened this issue Oct 17, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@dkocher
Copy link

dkocher commented Oct 17, 2022

The current release of Dropbox SDK Java supports Java 11+. If you are running Java 8 and want to use the SDK, you should user version 4.0.1.

I see no reason to not compile with a 1.8 target. It would allow interoperability with IKVM. Would require a partial revert of 8af548f.

dkocher added a commit to iterate-ch/dropbox-sdk-java that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2022
dkocher added a commit to iterate-ch/dropbox-sdk-java that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2022
dkocher added a commit to iterate-ch/dropbox-sdk-java that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2022
@handstandsam
Copy link
Contributor

PR Open #477 to address here.

@handstandsam
Copy link
Contributor

handstandsam commented Oct 17, 2022

This has been addressed. Java 8 was not longer under ETL https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/java-se-support-roadmap.html so we moved to 11, but this should happen in a major version, not a minor one. Apologies!

Reverted, and seems to work fine. Publishing is going to kick off and when publishing is done in a few hours it will be available here: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/dropbox/core/dropbox-core-sdk/5.4.4/

@handstandsam
Copy link
Contributor

A version with these Java 8 updates have been released as version 5.4.4 https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/dropbox/core/dropbox-core-sdk/5.4.4/

Thanks for letting us know about your issue!

@dkocher
Copy link
Author

dkocher commented Oct 17, 2022

Thanks for letting us know about your issue!

Many thanks for the quick turnaround. However it looks like this release does not include f1d3f68 previously available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants