Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better handle processes which exited with error #54

Open
dkarlovi opened this issue Dec 28, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Better handle processes which exited with error #54

dkarlovi opened this issue Dec 28, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@dkarlovi
Copy link
Collaborator

Q A
Bug report? no
Feature request? yes
BC Break report? no
RFC? yes
Branch? master

Currently, the processes which fail are not marked as such in the UI, they are just kept around and the impression (from users) is the process "hanged".

A better approach would be to keep track of the process execution and exit codes, marking the processes which exited unexpectedly in some way (maybe red-ish background or something?), signaling to the user this went badly.

@dpfaffenbauer
Copy link
Owner

yep, we currently don't monitor the process at all... so this would also allow us to monitor process which do not give directly feedback to the Process instance as well

@dkarlovi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The first step would be to just change the status to Failed, even that would give more information to the person looking at it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants