Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[API Proposal]: Allow retrieval of HttpRequestMessage from Polly.Context #4957

Open
martintmk opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
api-suggestion Early API idea and discussion, it is NOT ready for implementation area-resilience

Comments

@martintmk
Copy link
Contributor

Background and motivation

Clients using new resilience APIs based on top of Polly v8 might want to access HttpRequestMessage associated with the attempt being executed. This would allow the following scenarios:

Metering Enrichment

Client can decide to add additional metrics extracted from HttpRequestMessage using metering enrichment.

Custom Routing

For hedging or retries, the client might decide to change the URL for secondary attempts. This would also enable dynamic URL resolution.

Access to HttpRequestMessage in callbacks

For logging/other purposes the client uses callbacks and can be interested in the current request message.

API Proposal

namespace Polly;

public static class HttpResilienceContextExtensions
{
    public static HttpRequestMessage? GetRequestMessage(this ResilienceContext context);
    public static void SetRequestMessage(this ResilienceContext context, HttpRequestMessage? requestMessage);
}

API Usage

services
    .AddHttpClient("my-client", client => client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://primary-endpoint"))
    .AddStandardHedgingHandler()
    .Configure(options =>
    {
        options.Hedging.OnHedging = args =>
        {
            // Retrieve the request message
            HttpRequestMessage request = args.ActionContext.GetRequestMessage();

            UriBuilder uriBuilder = new(request.RequestUri);
            uriBuilder.Host = "secondary-endpoint";

            // Override the request URI
            request.RequestUri = uriBuilder.Uri;

            return default;
        };
    });

The example above demonstrates how the new API can be used to change the URL of outgoing request. Similar approach can be used for retries or telemetry enrichment.

Alternative Designs

The above example can be rewritten as:

ResiliencePropertyKey<HttpRequestMessage> requestMessageKey = new("Resilience.Http.RequestMessage");

services
    .AddHttpClient("my-client", client => client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://primary-endpoint"))
    .AddStandardHedgingHandler()
    .Configure(options =>
    {
        options.Hedging.OnHedging = args =>
        {
            // Retrieve the request message
            HttpRequestMessage? request = args.ActionContext.Properties.GetValue(requestMessageKey, null!);

            UriBuilder uriBuilder = new(request.RequestUri);
            uriBuilder.Host = "secondary-endpoint";

            // Override the request URI
            request.RequestUri = uriBuilder.Uri;

            return default;
        };
    });

However, this relies on some internal naming:
https://github.com/dotnet/extensions/blob/a8e17517bd5150cc0f992b66aa6591c7c6fbdfc4/src/Libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Resilience/Internal/ResilienceKeys.cs#L13C92-L13C122

It would be better to have built-in support for retrieving HttpRequestMessage from ResilienceContext as I suspect this will be a common scenario.

Risks

Caller retrieving and modifying HttpRequestMessage associated with the current attempt in a non-compatible way or doing some changes that will corrupt the request.

@martintmk martintmk added untriaged api-suggestion Early API idea and discussion, it is NOT ready for implementation labels Feb 20, 2024
@joperezr joperezr removed the untriaged label Mar 4, 2024
@joperezr
Copy link
Member

joperezr commented Mar 4, 2024

Given you are the main expert on this, are you expecting any feedback from anyone else @martintmk or is this ready for review?

@martintmk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Given you are the main expert on this, are you expecting any feedback from anyone else @martintmk or is this ready for review?

I believe this is ready for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api-suggestion Early API idea and discussion, it is NOT ready for implementation area-resilience
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants