Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Full support for custom provider aggregate functions #22957

Closed
Tracked by #26643 ...
roji opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #28092
Closed
Tracked by #26643 ...

Full support for custom provider aggregate functions #22957

roji opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #28092
Assignees
Labels
area-query closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. punted-for-6.0 type-enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@roji
Copy link
Member

roji commented Oct 11, 2020

Following discussion in #13278, I've done some exploratory work in npgsql/efcore.pg#1531 on PostgreSQL aggregate functions. Here are some issues I ran into:

/cc @smitpatel

Interesting candidate translations:

@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

GroupBy aggregate issue is not related to custom provider function. Not all GroupBy patterns work right now and no one can extend them either that is one of the part in #18923

For second point, just need to make TranslateExpression protected. But that issue is not related to aggregate either. Any custom queryable method will suffer that.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Oct 11, 2020

OK, thanks - it would be nice if we could make all this work in 6.0. It seems useful to me to track here everything what's needed for custom provider aggregate functions, but up to you if you feel everything's covered elsewhere.

@AndriySvyryd AndriySvyryd added this to the Backlog milestone Oct 12, 2020
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: Backlog, 6.0.0 Nov 4, 2020
@ajcvickers ajcvickers assigned smitpatel and roji and unassigned smitpatel Nov 4, 2020
@roji roji removed their assignment Nov 30, 2020
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: 6.0.0, Backlog May 6, 2021
@ajcvickers ajcvickers modified the milestones: Backlog, 7.0.0 Nov 3, 2021
@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Jan 28, 2022

Note #2981 which tracks string.Join (translatable with e.g. STRING_AGG). Could be good to implement these two issues together with #2981 testing the infrastructure introduced here.

smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.

Resolves #27132
Introduce a pass to translate grouping element chain ending in aggregate before translating it as a subquery.

Resolves #27226
Resolves #27433
Cause a pushdown when grouping key is complex so that SQL parser doesn't throw error that ungrouped columns are being referenced.

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.

Resolves #27132
Introduce a pass to translate grouping element chain ending in aggregate before translating it as a subquery.

Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Cause a pushdown when grouping key is complex so that SQL parser doesn't throw error that ungrouped columns are being referenced.

Relates to #22957
@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

Base infra added in #27931
For supporting custom functions, we need to add method call translator like hierarchy.

smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2022
Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 4, 2022
…7931)

Design:
- Introduce `SqlEnumerableExpression` - a holder class which indicates the `SqlExpression` is in form of a enumerable (or group) coming as a result of whole table selection or a grouping element. It also stores details about if `Distinct` is applied over grouping or if there are any orderings.
- Due to above `DistinctExpression` has been removed. The token while used to denote `Distinct` over grouping element were not valid in other parts of SQL tree hence it makes more sense to combine it with `SqlEnumerableExpression`.
- To support dual pass, `GroupByShaperExpression` contains 2 forms of grouping element. One element selector form which correlates directly with the parent grouped query, second subquery form which correlates to parent grouped query through a correlation predicate. Element selector is first used to translate aggregation. If that fails we use subquery form to translate as a subquery. Due to 2 forms of same component, GroupByShaperExpression disallows calling into VisitChildren method, any visitor which is visiting a tree containing GroupByShaperExpression (which appears only in `QueryExpression.ShaperExpression` or LINQ expression after remapping but before translation) must intercept the tree and either ignore or process it appropriately.
- An internal visitor (`GroupByAggregateChainProcessor`) inside SqlTranslator visits and process chain of queryable operations on a grouping element before aggregate is called and condense it into `SqlEnumerableExpression` which is then passed to method which translates aggregate. This visitor only processes Where/Distinct/Select for now. Future PR will add processing for OrderBy/ThenBy(Descending) operations to generate orderings.
- Side-effect above is that joins expanded over the grouping element (due to navigations used on aggregate chain), doesn't translate to aggregate anymore since we need to translate the join on parent query, remove the translated join if the chain didn't end in aggregate and also de-dupe same joins. Filing issue to improve this in future. Due to fragile nature of matching to lift the join, we shouldn't try to lift joins.
- To support custom aggregate operations, we will either reused `IMethodCallTranslator` or create a parallel structure for aggregate methods and call into it from SqlTranslator by passing translated SqlEnumerableExpression as appropriate.
- For complex grouping key, we cause a pushdown so that we can reference the grouping key through columns only. This allows us to reference the grouping key in correlation predicate for subquery without generating invalid SQL in many cases.
- With complex grouping key converting to columns, now we are able to correctly generate identifiers for grouping queries which makes more queries with correlated collections (where either parent or inner both queries can be groupby query) translatable.
- Erase client projection when applying aggregate operation over GroupBy result.
- When processing result selector in GroupBy use the updated key selector if the select expression was pushed down.

Resolves #27132
Resolves #27266
Resolves #27433
Resolves #23601
Resolves #27721
Resolves #27796
Resolves #27801
Resolves #19683

Relates to #22957
smitpatel added a commit that referenced this issue May 24, 2022
Resolves #22957

- Introduce IAggregateMethodCallTranslator and family to translate aggregate methods
- Currently we assume that either method instance or first argument (for static method) will be the one which can be of type enumerable, rest of the arguments if any are scalar.
- Also refactor code in SqlTranslator.VisitMethodCall to avoid visiting grouping element source multiple times
@ghost ghost closed this as completed in #28092 May 25, 2022
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2022
Resolves #22957

- Introduce IAggregateMethodCallTranslator and family to translate aggregate methods
- Currently we assume that either method instance or first argument (for static method) will be the one which can be of type enumerable, rest of the arguments if any are scalar.
- Also refactor code in SqlTranslator.VisitMethodCall to avoid visiting grouping element source multiple times
@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented May 25, 2022

@smitpatel keeping open just in order to verify top-level custom aggregate support (as in #28092 (comment)), which may require some extra work.

@roji roji reopened this May 25, 2022
@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

Filed #28097 for additional work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-query closed-fixed The issue has been fixed and is/will be included in the release indicated by the issue milestone. punted-for-6.0 type-enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants
@ajcvickers @smitpatel @roji @AndriySvyryd and others