Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Run CI on push to *.*.x branch #256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2021
Merged

Run CI on push to *.*.x branch #256

merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2021

Conversation

simPod
Copy link
Contributor

@simPod simPod commented Jul 19, 2021

Run on merge in other words

@simPod
Run CI on push to *.*.x branch
897edc3 
Run on merge in other words
@simPod
Copy link
Contributor Author

simPod commented Sep 17, 2021

Hello @doctrine, I wonder if we want to proceed?

@SenseException SenseException requested a review from a team September 17, 2021 20:53
morozov
morozov approved these changes Sep 17, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@morozov morozov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that there are old branches that do not match the pattern. Given that there are release tags, should we delete the branches? What's the point in being able to open a PR against an unsupported one?

@greg0ire greg0ire merged commit f86c16a into doctrine:9.0.x Sep 19, 2021
@greg0ire
Copy link
Member

Thanks @simPod

@morozov , this is probably true for more than just this repository, should we discuss this at a higher level?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@morozov morozov morozov approved these changes

@SenseException SenseException SenseException approved these changes

@malarzm malarzm malarzm approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@simPod @greg0ire @morozov @SenseException @malarzm