Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[backport] Fix gamma neg log likelihood. (#7275) #7285

Merged

Conversation

trivialfis
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@trivialfis trivialfis changed the title [backport] Fix gamma nloglik [backport] Fix gamma neg log likelihood. (#7275) (#7285) Oct 5, 2021
@trivialfis trivialfis changed the title [backport] Fix gamma neg log likelihood. (#7275) (#7285) [backport] Fix gamma neg log likelihood. (#7275) Oct 5, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #7285 (2340f30) into release_1.5.0 (508a0b0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           release_1.5.0    #7285   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage          82.64%   82.64%           
==============================================
  Files                 13       13           
  Lines               4067     4067           
==============================================
  Hits                3361     3361           
  Misses               706      706           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 508a0b0...2340f30. Read the comment docs.

@trivialfis trivialfis merged commit cdbfd21 into dmlc:release_1.5.0 Oct 5, 2021
@trivialfis trivialfis deleted the backport-fix-gamma-nloglik branch October 5, 2021 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants