Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove client from TeamMember constructor #3409

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Aug 17, 2019
Merged

Remove client from TeamMember constructor #3409

merged 3 commits into from Aug 17, 2019

Conversation

PyroTechniac
Copy link
Contributor

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:
The client property is already present on the Team object, so it doesn't need to be passed to the team member constructor when adding them to the Collection.

Status

  • Code changes have been tested against the Discord API, or there are no code changes
  • I know how to update typings and have done so, or typings don't need updating

Semantic versioning classification:

  • This PR changes the library's interface (methods or parameters added)
    • This PR includes breaking changes (methods removed or renamed, parameters moved or removed)
  • This PR only includes non-code changes, like changes to documentation, README, etc.

Copy link
Member

@vladfrangu vladfrangu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty sure this was done to stay consistent with other constructors (GuildMember for example), so I'm 🤷‍♂ about this change

@SpaceEEC SpaceEEC merged commit ab27dd0 into discordjs:master Aug 17, 2019
samsamson33 pushed a commit to samsamson33/discord.js that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2020
* Remove client from TeamMember constructor part 1

* Remove client from TeamMember constructor part 2

* update typings
samsamson33 added a commit to samsamson33/discord.js that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants