Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StateStore transactions is not displayed using Go #4059

Closed
salaboy opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4127
Closed

StateStore transactions is not displayed using Go #4059

salaboy opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4127
Assignees
Labels
content/missing-information More information requested or needed good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@salaboy
Copy link
Contributor

salaboy commented Mar 3, 2024

What content needs to be created or modified?

In the following section: https://docs.dapr.io/developing-applications/building-blocks/state-management/howto-get-save-state/#perform-state-transactions "Go" examples are not shown.
I found some examples by looking into the Go SDK: https://github.com/dapr/go-sdk/blob/5ef7aa2234d4d4c07769ad31cde223ef11c4e33e/Readme.md?plain=1#L157

This should be displayed in the Docs.

Describe the solution you'd like
Having all the supported languages SDKs displayed in the examples for state trasactions

Where should the new material be placed?

https://docs.dapr.io/developing-applications/building-blocks/state-management/howto-get-save-state/#perform-state-transactions

The associated pull request from dapr/dapr, dapr/components-contrib, or other Dapr code repos

Additional context

@salaboy salaboy added the content/missing-information More information requested or needed label Mar 3, 2024
@msfussell msfussell added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 4, 2024
@hhunter-ms hhunter-ms self-assigned this May 2, 2024
@msfussell
Copy link
Member

@salaboy - Can you review this PR for code accuracy?

@salaboy
Copy link
Contributor Author

salaboy commented May 3, 2024

@msfussell I've reviewed the PR and added a few suggestions: #4127 (review)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content/missing-information More information requested or needed good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants