You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I am using the multi_asset_check function, my goal is to apply multiple checks on an asset. Earlier I was using asset_check function and I was able to access the asset's output and apply the check onto it easily. (FYI: my asset output is a pandas dataframe). Now with multi_asset_check I am unable to access the Asset's output, I do not know why I can retrieve the output when working with asset_check but now with multi_asset_check. Is there some different syntax or something I am missing?
Please have a look at the code below, in the combined_check function I want to access the output of the asset in the df variable. earlier I just used context_df and it worked fine, now I am stuck with this.
I tried looking in documentation and other issues but its really not helpful.
Dagster version
1.7.3
What's the issue?
Hi, I am using the
multi_asset_check
function, my goal is to apply multiple checks on an asset. Earlier I was usingasset_check
function and I was able to access the asset's output and apply the check onto it easily. (FYI: my asset output is a pandas dataframe). Now withmulti_asset_check
I am unable to access the Asset's output, I do not know why I can retrieve the output when working withasset_check
but now withmulti_asset_check
. Is there some different syntax or something I am missing?Please have a look at the code below, in the combined_check function I want to access the output of the asset in the
df
variable. earlier I just usedcontext_df
and it worked fine, now I am stuck with this.I tried looking in documentation and other issues but its really not helpful.
Below is my code for reference -
What did you expect to happen?
No response
How to reproduce?
No response
Deployment type
Local
Deployment details
No response
Additional information
No response
Message from the maintainers
Impacted by this issue? Give it a 👍! We factor engagement into prioritization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: