Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

avoid backtracking when parsing #89

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

avoid backtracking when parsing #89

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mbostock
Copy link
Member

This seems to address the issue, but is slightly too lax, and I would like to avoid the tiny amount of code duplication. And I haven’t tested performance in the non-degenerate case.

@mbostock mbostock requested a review from Fil February 18, 2021 15:38
@mbostock
Copy link
Member Author

mbostock commented Feb 18, 2021

It also looks like modern browsers are more lax, for example, they don’t distinguish between rgb and rgba or hsl and hsla. I’ve done that, but I think we’re still a little too lax in the sense of allowing percents and non-percents to be mixed.

@mbostock mbostock marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2021 16:22
Copy link
Member

@Fil Fil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We stop at level 3, right? no rad, deg, turn units? Modern browsers would implement level 4
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color_value shows an awful mix of possibilities ;-)

The attack now fails, with a string of 5 million chars passing in < 1s

attack_str.length: 5000005: 613 ms

whereas in the current master we die early:

attack_str.length: 100005: 8704 ms
attack_str.length: 200005: 35656 ms

the code is a bit slower in my tests, from 3800ms to perform 20 million conversions, to 5200ms.

@mbostock
Copy link
Member Author

I’m worried that if our parser is too lax, someone will parse a color with d3-color and assume that it’s valid, and then try to use the same string with the browser natively where it will fail. I think it’s okay if the inverse is not true, i.e. if a browser fully supports CSS Color Level 4 but d3-color only supports Level 3 (plus perhaps some subset of Level 4).

@Fil
Copy link
Member

Fil commented Dec 1, 2021

For reference, there is a parser here https://github.com/deanm/css-color-parser-js/blob/master/csscolorparser.js (but it doesn't make exactly the same choices).

@mbostock
Copy link
Member Author

mbostock commented Dec 1, 2021

I probably need to bite the proverbial bullet and implement a proper tokenizer and parser here.

@kulak-at
Copy link

Is there any update on that? It would be great to have this merged as it's affecting a lot of packages: https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-D3COLOR-1076592

@mbostock
Copy link
Member Author

Superseded by #99.

@mbostock mbostock closed this Mar 27, 2022
@mbostock mbostock deleted the avoid-backtracking branch March 27, 2022 23:50
@mbostock mbostock mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants