fix: windows CI with Vite 3

[lmiller1990]

• Closes Remove fs.sync calls from framework detection #23016
• Unblocks release 🎉

User facing changelog

N/A

Additional details

Couple things here:

1. Patch so windows CI can run with Vite 3. We updated to Vite 3 in feat: update to Vite 3 #22915.

• There is an upstream fix for this that will be in Vite 3.0.5, so I just patch-package for now.
• Upstream patch: fix(config): use file url for import path (fixes #9471) vitejs/vite#9473. We can remove the patch when this lands, I'll keep an eye on it.
• We only use Vite in development, we don't ship to the end user, so this isn't a big deal to use patch-package.

2. Converted a bunch of fs.readJsonSync to fs.readJson to hopefully reduce some flake - many synchronous file system reads can slow down CI, especially windows.
3. Added some timeouts to reduce flake.

Steps to test

N/A

How has the user experience changed?

N/A

PR Tasks

• Have tests been added/updated?
• Has the original issue (or this PR, if no issue exists) been tagged with a release in ZenHub? (user-facing changes only)
• Has a PR for user-facing changes been opened in cypress-documentation?
• Have API changes been updated in the type definitions?

[cypress-bot]

Thanks for taking the time to open a PR!

• Create a Draft Pull Request if your PR is not ready for review. Mark the PR as Ready for Review when you're ready for a Cypress team member to review the PR.
• Become familiar with the Code Review Checklist for guidelines on coding standards and what needs to be done before a PR can be merged.

[cypress]

---

Test summary

4377 • 0 • 51 • 0 • 0

---

Run details

Project	cypress
Status	Passed
Commit	5ac9b5b
Started	Aug 2, 2022 7:30 AM
Ended	Aug 2, 2022 7:41 AM
Duration	11:28 💡
OS	Linux Debian - 11.3
Browser	Firefox 99

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️

---

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

[ryanthemanuel]

Let’s either convert everything to async or have this use then. Errors clauses by checkDependenciesForComponentTesting will be swallowed like this.

[ryanthemanuel]

Never mind. I was wrong about this.