Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

s-o-g often generates pdf docs different from vanilla #697

Open
strogdon opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 10 comments
Open

s-o-g often generates pdf docs different from vanilla #697

strogdon opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 10 comments

Comments

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor

strogdon commented May 23, 2022

This is the table of contents page for combinat.pdf. The formatting is not preserved in the attached but notice that the page numbering is different.

This is from s-o-g:
s-o-g.pdf

This is from vanilla:
vanilla.pdf

Discovered this when investigating whether s-o-g had the same undefined reference (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33885) as vanilla. They do have the undefined reference but it appears on different pages.

@kiwifb
Copy link
Collaborator

kiwifb commented May 23, 2022

Are they both formatted in A4?

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, my latex is suppose to produce letterpaper output.

@kiwifb
Copy link
Collaborator

kiwifb commented May 23, 2022

So, it becomes, are both US letter :)

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I don't see how they could be different. The vanilla is clearly letterpaper since I can view the tex file. I don't immediately have the s-o-g tex file. The above referenced pages look identical in size when viewed with a pdf viewer.

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor Author

The spacing after a bold faced paragraph item is different. There is more space with the s-o-g result.

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perhaps sphinx related. Vanilla uses sphinx-4.4.0.

@kiwifb
Copy link
Collaborator

kiwifb commented May 23, 2022

Are you using sphinx 4.5.0 which is (on my system) in ~arch?

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes

@strogdon
Copy link
Contributor Author

On my system 4.5.0-r1 is stable.

@kiwifb
Copy link
Collaborator

kiwifb commented May 23, 2022

I'll need to sync later then. I was expecting moving to 4.5.0 to be as troublesome as moving to 4.3 and 4.4 was.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants