Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.8: Prepare for the next release #929

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Nov 20, 2022
Merged

v0.8: Prepare for the next release #929

merged 4 commits into from Nov 20, 2022

Conversation

taiki-e
Copy link
Member

@taiki-e taiki-e commented Nov 20, 2022

Backports #922 and #926.

Changes:

Closes #928

taiki-e and others added 4 commits November 20, 2022 16:48
Some build systems such as the Yocto project define custom
rust targets, of the form 'arch-somevendor-linux-gnu/musl'
(only the 'somevendor' part is custom, the rest matches rust's
definitions).

This causes mismatches with crossbeam's lists of targets
which are built from the standard rust target list, and
always have 'unknown' as the vendor.

This change simply replaces such custom vendors with 'unknown' when
the third component of the target is 'linux'.
- crossbeam-utils 0.8.12 -> 0.8.13
- crossbeam-queue 0.3.6 -> 0.3.7
- crossbeam-epoch 0.9.11 -> 0.9.12
@taiki-e
Copy link
Member Author

taiki-e commented Nov 20, 2022

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2022
929: v0.8: Prepare for the next release r=taiki-e a=taiki-e

Backports #922 and #926.

Changes:
- crossbeam-utils 0.8.12 -> 0.8.13
  - Update `memoffset` to 0.7. (#926)
  - Improve support for custom targets. (#922)
- crossbeam-queue 0.3.6 -> 0.3.7
  - Improve support for custom targets. (#922)
- crossbeam-epoch 0.9.11 -> 0.9.12
  - Improve support for custom targets. (#922)

Closes #928

Co-authored-by: Taiki Endo <te316e89@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
Co-authored-by: Griffin Smith <root@gws.fyi>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Nov 20, 2022

Timed out.

@taiki-e
Copy link
Member Author

taiki-e commented Nov 20, 2022

bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Nov 20, 2022

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 5feb8e6 into v0.8 Nov 20, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the v0.8-next branch November 20, 2022 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants