feat(x/mint): Mint issuance using epochs #20044
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update involves transitioning the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
…ita/mint-issuance
…ita/mint-issuance
…ita/mint-issuance
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.pulsar.go (2)
21-21: Add a comment describing thereduction_started_epochfield.Adding a descriptive comment for the new field
reduction_started_epochwill improve code readability and maintainability, especially for new developers or external contributors who might work with this codebase in the future.
602-606: Document thereduction_started_epochfield in theGenesisStatestruct.Add comprehensive documentation for the
reduction_started_epochfield in theGenesisStatestruct to clarify its purpose and usage. This documentation is crucial for developers and users of the SDK to understand the implications of this field.
…ita/mint-issuance
…ita/mint-issuance
…ita/mint-issuance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (33 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/e2e/mint/grpc.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- simapp/app.go
- tests/e2e/mint/grpc.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (1)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (13)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (13)
22-22: Added field descriptor forepoch_provisionsin theMinterstruct.
30-30: Initialized field descriptor forepoch_provisionsin theMinterstruct.
110-115: Added handling for theepoch_provisionsfield in theRangemethod offastReflection_Minter. This ensures the field is considered during reflection-based operations.
135-136: Added check for the presence of theepoch_provisionsfield in theHasmethod offastReflection_Minter.
157-158: Added clearing functionality for theepoch_provisionsfield in theClearmethod offastReflection_Minter.
181-183: Added getter for theepoch_provisionsfield in theGetmethod offastReflection_Minter.
208-209: Added setter for theepoch_provisionsfield in theSetmethod offastReflection_Minter.
234-235: Confirmed that theepoch_provisionsfield is not mutable in theMutablemethod offastReflection_Minter.
253-254: Added functionality to create a new field forepoch_provisionsin theNewFieldmethod offastReflection_Minter.
332-335: Added size calculation for theepoch_provisionsfield in theProtoMethodsmethod offastReflection_Minter.
365-371: Added marshaling functionality for theepoch_provisionsfield in theProtoMethodsmethod offastReflection_Minter.
499-530: Added unmarshaling functionality for theepoch_provisionsfield in theProtoMethodsmethod offastReflection_Minter.
Line range hint
1670-1713: Added theepoch_provisionsfield to theMinterstruct to represent rewards for the current epoch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (3)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (1)
22-22: Add a comment describing the purpose offd_Minter_epoch_provisions.It's good practice to add a descriptive comment for exported variables to improve code readability and maintainability.
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go (2)
3250-3250: Ensure theInflationfield description is clear and detailed.Consider adding a more descriptive comment for the
Inflationfield in theQueryInflationResponsestruct to explain what the inflation value represents and how it is used.
3382-3382: Clarify theepoch_provisionsfield in the documentation.The
epoch_provisionsfield inQueryEpochProvisionsResponsecould benefit from a detailed comment explaining its purpose and usage within the system.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
x/mint/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/mint/types/mint.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/mint/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (6)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.pulsar.go (15 hunks)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (29 hunks)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go (45 hunks)
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.proto (2 hunks)
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.proto (3 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (2)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.pulsar.go
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.proto
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.proto
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.proto
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (2)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (12)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (11)
30-30: Ensure initialization offd_Minter_epoch_provisionsis thread-safe.Verification successful
The review comment raised concerns about the thread safety of the initialization of
fd_Minter_epoch_provisions. The provided script output shows two main points of interaction withfd_Minter_epoch_provisions:
Initialization in the
init()function: The variablefd_Minter_epoch_provisionsis initialized within theinit()function. This function is automatically executed by Go when the package is initialized, and it is guaranteed by the Go runtime to be executed only once in a single-threaded context before any other part of the package is accessed. This ensures that the initialization offd_Minter_epoch_provisionsis thread-safe.Usage in a conditional block: The variable is used within a conditional block to check if a function
fshould be executed withfd_Minter_epoch_provisionsand a value derived fromx.EpochProvisions. This usage does not involve modification of thefd_Minter_epoch_provisionsitself, but rather reads its value.Given this information, the initialization of
fd_Minter_epoch_provisionsis thread-safe due to the nature of theinit()function in Go. The usage of the variable elsewhere in the code does not affect its initialization safety.Therefore, the initialization of
fd_Minter_epoch_provisionsis confirmed to be thread-safe as per the Go language's execution guarantees for theinit()function.
Thread-Safe Initialization Confirmed
The initialization of
fd_Minter_epoch_provisionswithin theinit()function is thread-safe, as this function is executed in a single-threaded context by the Go runtime. No further action is required regarding the thread safety of this initialization.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential data races during the initialization of `fd_Minter_epoch_provisions`. # Test: Search for concurrent writes or reads to `fd_Minter_epoch_provisions` during initialization. rg --type go 'fd_Minter_epoch_provisions' --context 5Length of output: 2087
110-115: Ensure thatEpochProvisionsis properly handled in all relevant methods.Verification successful
The review comment suggests verifying that
EpochProvisionsis properly handled in all relevant methods across the codebase. The provided script searches for occurrences ofEpochProvisionsin Go files and provides context around each occurrence.From the script output, it's evident that
EpochProvisionsis used in various contexts including simulation settings, query handlers, and parameter settings. It appears in function definitions, struct definitions, and method implementations, indicating that it is a well-integrated part of the system.Here are some specific observations:
EpochProvisionsis used in theGenEpochProvisionsfunction to generate random values, which suggests it's part of simulation or testing scenarios.- It is part of the
Minterstruct and is used in methods likeValidateMinterandNextEpochProvisions, which handle its validation and computation for the next epoch.- It is also part of the
Paramsstruct asGenesisEpochProvisions, indicating its use in configuration or initialization contexts.- The
QueryEpochProvisionsmethod in various files suggests that it is exposed via an API, allowing external queries.Given the widespread and consistent usage of
EpochProvisionsacross different parts of the codebase, including its presence in critical functions and structs, it seems to be properly handled. However, without specific criteria for what "proper handling" entails (e.g., specific business logic or constraints), this assessment is based on the integration and usage consistency observed in the provided script outputs.Based on this analysis, it appears that the handling of
EpochProvisionsaligns with its usage in various parts of the system, from initialization and configuration to runtime operations and API exposure.Final response:
The handling of
EpochProvisionsacross the codebase appears consistent and integrated into various system components, including simulation, validation, parameter configuration, and API exposure. This suggests thatEpochProvisionsis properly managed in all relevant methods as per the current implementation details provided.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `EpochProvisions` is correctly utilized in all methods where it's relevant. # Test: Search for the usage of `EpochProvisions` in the codebase to ensure it's correctly handled. rg --type go 'EpochProvisions' --context 5Length of output: 148561
135-136: Confirm that theHasmethod correctly identifies the population status ofEpochProvisions.Verification successful
The review comment asks to confirm that the
Hasmethod correctly identifies the population status ofEpochProvisionsin the fileapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go. The provided script output shows the relevant code snippets whereEpochProvisionsis checked within theHasmethod.From the output, we can see that the
Hasmethod forEpochProvisionsis implemented as follows in themint.pulsar.gofile:if x.EpochProvisions != "" { return x.EpochProvisions != "" }This implementation checks if the
EpochProvisionsstring is not empty and returnstrueif it is not empty, which correctly identifies whetherEpochProvisionsis populated.Given this information, it appears that the
Hasmethod is implemented correctly as it properly checks the population status ofEpochProvisionsby verifying that the string is not empty. Therefore, the review comment is consistent with the codebase.
Verification of
EpochProvisionsHandling inHasMethodThe
Hasmethod implementation forEpochProvisionsinmint.pulsar.gocorrectly checks if the field is populated by evaluating whether the string is not empty. This aligns with the expected functionality of aHasmethod in determining the presence of data in a field.
- File:
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go- Method Implementation: Returns
trueifEpochProvisionsis not an empty string, correctly indicating that the field is populated.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the `Has` method for `EpochProvisions` is correctly implemented. # Test: Check the implementation of the `Has` method for handling `EpochProvisions`. rg --type go 'Has' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 2878
157-158: Review theClearmethod forEpochProvisionsto ensure it correctly clears the field.Verification successful
The output from the executed script provides information about the implementation of the
Clearmethod forEpochProvisionsin themint.pulsar.gofile. The relevant lines show that theEpochProvisionsfield is being set to an empty string as a means of clearing it:api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go- x.EpochProvisions = ""This line is part of the
Clearmethod implementation for theEpochProvisionsfield, indicating that the method is designed to reset this field to an empty string. This is a typical pattern for clearing fields in many programming contexts, especially when dealing with strings in data structures.Given this information, it appears that the
Clearmethod forEpochProvisionsis implemented as expected, setting the field to an empty string to denote that it has been cleared. There is no indication of any malfunction or incorrect implementation in the provided script output.Therefore, the review comment concerning the verification of the
Clearmethod forEpochProvisionshas been addressed, and the implementation aligns with typical practices for clearing fields.Final Response:
The
Clearmethod forEpochProvisionsinmint.pulsar.gocorrectly clears the field by setting it to an empty string. This is a standard approach for handling such operations in Go.
- File:
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go- Method:
ClearScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct functionality of the `Clear` method for `EpochProvisions`. # Test: Examine the `Clear` method implementation for `EpochProvisions`. rg --type go 'Clear' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 2345
181-183: Check theGetmethod implementation forEpochProvisionsto ensure it returns the correct default values when unpopulated.
208-209: Ensure that theSetmethod forEpochProvisionscorrectly handles value setting.Verification successful
The review comment requested verification of the
Setmethod forEpochProvisionsin theapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.gofile, specifically to ensure it correctly handles value setting.From the script output, we can observe the following relevant lines in
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go:api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go- value := x.EpochProvisions api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go- x.EpochProvisions = value.Interface().(string)These lines indicate that the
Setmethod is indeed setting theEpochProvisionsfield by casting the interface value to a string. This matches the expected behavior described in the review comment, which is to handle the value setting correctly.Given this information, it appears that the
Setmethod forEpochProvisionsis implemented as expected, and the review comment's concern seems to be addressed correctly in the code.Therefore, the verification can be concluded with the following response:
The
Setmethod forEpochProvisionsinapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.gocorrectly handles the value setting as per the implementation observed in the provided script output. No issues found regarding this functionality.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `Set` method correctly assigns values to `EpochProvisions`. # Test: Check the `Set` method implementation for `EpochProvisions`. rg --type go 'Set' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 3911
234-235: Confirm that theMutablemethod correctly reports the immutability ofEpochProvisions.Verification successful
The review comment requested verification of whether the
Mutablemethod correctly reports the immutability ofEpochProvisionsin thecosmos.mint.v1beta1.Minterclass. The provided shell script output shows relevant code snippets from themint.pulsar.goandquery.pulsar.gofiles.From the output, we can observe the following:
- The
Mutablemethod inquery.pulsar.goexplicitly states that theepoch_provisionsfield of thecosmos.mint.v1beta1.QueryEpochProvisionsResponsemessage is not mutable. This is confirmed by the panic statement:panic(fmt.Errorf("field epoch_provisions of message cosmos.mint.v1beta1.QueryEpochProvisionsResponse is not mutable")).This directly addresses the concern raised in the review comment about the immutability of the
EpochProvisionsfield. The code explicitly handles and reports the immutability of this field, which aligns with the expected behavior mentioned in the review comment.Therefore, the verification confirms that the
Mutablemethod behaves as expected in reporting the immutability of theEpochProvisionsfield.
Immutable Field Handling Confirmed
The
Mutablemethod in thecosmos.mint.v1beta1codebase correctly identifies and reports the immutability of theEpochProvisionsfield. This is explicitly handled in thequery.pulsar.gofile, ensuring that any attempts to modify this field will result in a clear error message.
- Location:
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the `Mutable` method accurately reflects the immutability of `EpochProvisions`. # Test: Review the `Mutable` method for `EpochProvisions` to confirm it behaves as expected. rg --type go 'Mutable' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 4048
253-254: Check theNewFieldmethod forEpochProvisionsto ensure it returns a correct new value.Verification successful
The output from the executed script provides information about the
NewFieldmethod implementations related toEpochProvisionsin thequery.pulsar.gofile. However, the review comment specifically pertains to themint.pulsar.gofile and the handling ofEpochProvisionsin a switch case, which is not covered by the script output.The script output shows the
NewFieldmethod for bothQueryEpochProvisionsRequestandQueryEpochProvisionsResponsein thequery.pulsar.gofile, but it does not provide any information about themint.pulsar.gofile or the specific switch case mentioned in the review comment.Given this, the script did not verify the correct part of the codebase as per the review comment. To properly address the review comment, we need to inspect the
NewFieldmethod or similar logic in themint.pulsar.gofile, specifically how it handles theEpochProvisionsfield.To proceed, I will generate a new script to inspect the relevant parts of the
mint.pulsar.gofile.
The provided script output from
mint.pulsar.goshows the handling of theEpochProvisionsfield within theMinterstruct. Specifically, it details how theEpochProvisionsfield is managed in various methods such asGet,Set,Has, andClear. Each of these methods correctly handles theEpochProvisionsfield according to its intended functionality:
- The
Getmethod returns the value ofEpochProvisions.- The
Setmethod updates the value ofEpochProvisions.- The
Hasmethod checks ifEpochProvisionsis not an empty string.- The
Clearmethod setsEpochProvisionsto an empty string.This confirms that the
EpochProvisionsfield is appropriately managed in theMinterstruct within themint.pulsar.gofile. The review comment asked to check theNewFieldmethod forEpochProvisionsto ensure it returns a correct new value. The script output shows that theNewFieldmethod returns a string value ofEpochProvisionswhen it is not empty, which aligns with the expected behavior for handling this field.Based on this analysis, the handling of the
EpochProvisionsfield in themint.pulsar.gofile is verified to be correct as per the review comment's concern.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `NewField` method for `EpochProvisions` returns the appropriate new value. # Test: Inspect the `NewField` method implementation for `EpochProvisions`. rg --type go 'NewField' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 2218
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of `EpochProvisions` in the `mint.pulsar.go` file. # Test: Inspect the handling of `EpochProvisions` in the `mint.pulsar.go` file. rg --type go 'EpochProvisions' api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go --context 10Length of output: 17445
332-335: Review the size calculation forEpochProvisionsto ensure it is included correctly.Verification successful
The review comment concerns the accuracy of the size calculation for
EpochProvisionsin theapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.gofile. The provided script output shows various instances whereEpochProvisionsis involved in size calculations across different files in the codebase.From the output, it's evident that
EpochProvisionsis treated as a field that has its ownSize()method, which is used to calculate its size for serialization purposes. This method is called in several places, indicating a standardized approach to handling the size calculation of this field.In the specific file and lines in question (
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go), the size calculation is done by first determining the length ofEpochProvisionsand then using this length in the size calculation formula. This approach is consistent with the usage seen in other parts of the codebase, such asx/mint/types/mint.pb.go.Given this consistency and the presence of a dedicated
Size()method forEpochProvisions, it appears that the size calculation forEpochProvisionsin the mentioned file and lines is implemented correctly and in line with the rest of the codebase.Therefore, the review comment seems to be addressed adequately in the code.
Size Calculation for
EpochProvisionsVerifiedThe size calculation for
EpochProvisionsinapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.goappears to be implemented correctly and is consistent with other parts of the codebase whereEpochProvisionsis involved.
- File:
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go- Method: Using
len(x.EpochProvisions)for size calculation.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm that the size calculation for `EpochProvisions` is accurate. # Test: Check the size calculation method for the inclusion of `EpochProvisions`. rg --type go 'Size' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 6796
365-371: Ensure the marshaling ofEpochProvisionsis correctly implemented.Verification successful
The output from the executed script provides several references to the handling of
EpochProvisionsin various parts of the codebase, particularly in marshaling and unmarshaling operations. The references include bothQueryEpochProvisionsRequestandQueryEpochProvisionsResponsetypes, indicating thatEpochProvisionsis indeed being marshaled and unmarshaled in these contexts.From the output, it is evident that the marshaling of
EpochProvisionsis implemented in multiple files and methods, such asMarshalTo,MarshalToSizedBuffer, and directly within thequery.pulsar.gofile. The specific lines fromapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.goshow the process of copyingEpochProvisionsintodAtA, encoding its length, and setting a protocol buffer field tag, which aligns with typical protocol buffer marshaling patterns in Go.Given this information, it appears that the marshaling of
EpochProvisionsas shown in the snippet fromapi/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.gois consistent with other marshaling implementations in the codebase. Therefore, the implementation in the provided snippet seems to be correctly handling theEpochProvisions.Conclusion:
The marshaling ofEpochProvisionsin the provided code snippet is implemented correctly and is consistent with other parts of the codebase that handle similar data structures.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct marshaling behavior for `EpochProvisions`. # Test: Examine the marshaling function to ensure `EpochProvisions` is handled properly. rg --type go 'Marshal' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 5928
499-530: Check the unmarshaling logic forEpochProvisionsto ensure it correctly parses the field.Verification successful
The output from the executed script provides several references to the unmarshaling logic related to
EpochProvisionsacross different files in the codebase. Specifically, it shows the handling of this field in various contexts, including error handling for incorrect wire types and the actual assignment of the field's value from the byte slicedAtA.From the output, we can observe:
- The unmarshaling logic checks for the correct wire type and handles potential errors like integer overflow, unexpected EOF, and invalid length.
- The actual value for
EpochProvisionsis extracted from the byte slice and converted to a string, which is then assigned to the respective struct field.This aligns with the snippet provided in the review comment, where similar checks and assignments are performed. The logic appears to be consistent across different parts of the codebase where
EpochProvisionsis handled, suggesting that the unmarshaling process for this field is implemented correctly.Given this information, it seems that the unmarshaling logic for
EpochProvisionsis correctly parsing the field as per the requirements and consistent error handling patterns observed in the codebase.Conclusion:
The unmarshaling logic forEpochProvisionsin the provided code snippet is implemented correctly and is consistent with other parts of the codebase handling similar data.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm that the unmarshaling logic for `EpochProvisions` is correctly implemented. # Test: Inspect the unmarshaling function for correct parsing of `EpochProvisions`. rg --type go 'Unmarshal' --context 10 | grep 'EpochProvisions'Length of output: 5372
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/query.pulsar.go (1)
3462-3502: Verify the correctness of HTTP paths in service annotations.Check that the HTTP paths specified in the service annotations correctly map to the intended handlers. This is crucial for ensuring that the API behaves as expected when accessed over HTTP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/mint/README.md (1)
Line range hint
129-129: Separate the adverb "however" for grammatical correctness.- The maximum rate change possible is defined to be 13% per year, however, the annual inflation is capped as between 7% and 20%. + The maximum rate change possible is defined to be 13% per year; however, the annual inflation is capped as between 7% and 20%.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/mint/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/mint/types/mint.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (9)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.pulsar.go (15 hunks)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (29 hunks)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
- tests/e2e/mint/grpc.go (2 hunks)
- x/mint/README.md (10 hunks)
- x/mint/migrations/v4/migrate_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/mint/module.go (3 hunks)
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.proto (2 hunks)
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.proto (2 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.pulsar.go
- simapp/app.go
- tests/e2e/mint/grpc.go
- x/mint/module.go
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/genesis.proto
- x/mint/proto/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.proto
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (4)
x/mint/README.md (4)
Near line 70: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...ion of theMaxSupplyparameter allows controlling the maximum supply of tokens minted by ...
Near line 110: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...by external modules. NOTE: Only one of BeginBlock or BeginEpoch hooks should be enabled f...
Near line 113: A determiner appears to be missing. Consider inserting it.
Context: ...nting. ### Inflation rate calculation Inflation rate is calculated using an "inflation ...
Near line 129: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...e possible is defined to be 13% per year, however, the annual inflation is capped as betwe...
Path-based Instructions (3)
x/mint/migrations/v4/migrate_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/mint/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (13)
api/cosmos/mint/v1beta1/mint.pulsar.go (13)
22-22: Addition offd_Minter_epoch_provisionsfield descriptor.
30-30: Initialization offd_Minter_epoch_provisionsin theinitfunction.
110-115: Handling ofEpochProvisionsin theRangemethod offastReflection_Minter.
135-136: Check for the presence ofEpochProvisionsin theHasmethod.
157-158: Clearing ofEpochProvisionsin theClearmethod.
181-183: Retrieval ofEpochProvisionsvalue in theGetmethod.
208-209: Setting ofEpochProvisionsvalue in theSetmethod.
234-235: Attempt to mutateEpochProvisionsin theMutablemethod correctly triggers a panic since the field is not mutable.
253-254: Proper handling ofNewFieldforEpochProvisionsto return a default string value.
332-335: Correct calculation of size forEpochProvisionsin theProtoMethodssize function.
365-371: Proper marshaling ofEpochProvisionsin theProtoMethodsmarshal function.
499-530: Correct handling ofEpochProvisionsin theProtoMethodsunmarshal function, including error handling for wire types and length.
Line range hint
1665-1708: Addition ofEpochProvisionsfield in theMinterstruct and its getter method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/mint/README.md (1)
Line range hint
10-26: Correct the indentation of the unordered list items for better readability.- * [State](#state) - * [Minter](#minter) - * [Params](#params) - * [LastReductionEpoch](#lastreductionepoch) - * [Begin Epoch](#begin-epoch) - * [NextEpochProvisions](#nextepochprovisions) - * [EpochProvision](#epochprovision) + * [State](#state) + * [Minter](#minter) + * [Params](#params) + * [LastReductionEpoch](#lastreductionepoch) + * [Begin Epoch](#begin-epoch) + * [NextEpochProvisions](#nextepochprovisions) + * [EpochProvision](#epochprovision)
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/mint/README.md (10 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/migrator.go (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (2)
x/mint/README.md (2)
Near line 128: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...e desired ratio (67%). The maximum rate change possible is defined to be 13% per year,...
Near line 129: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...e possible is defined to be 13% per year, however, the annual inflation is capped as betwe...
Path-based Instructions (2)
x/mint/keeper/migrator.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/mint/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (3)
x/mint/keeper/migrator.go (2)
Line range hint
39-48: LGTM! The migration logic forMigrate2to3correctly initializes and sets the newMaxSupplyparameter.
51-66: LGTM! The migration logic forMigrate3to4correctly handles theLastReductionEpochparameter, ensuring it is initialized and stored properly.x/mint/README.md (1)
12-15: LGTM! The documentation updates correctly reflect the new epoch-based minting system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/mint/keeper/migrator.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/mint/keeper/migrator.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/mint/keeper/hooks.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/mint/keeper/hooks.go
…ita/mint-issuance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/mint/go.modis excluded by!**/*.modx/mint/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- simapp/app.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- simapp/app.go
This reverts commit 3a7479b.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (5)
x/mint/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
37-40: Add documentation for theEpochsKeeperinterface and its method.To maintain consistency and clarity, consider adding comments to describe the
EpochsKeeperinterface and itsGetEpochInfomethod.x/mint/depinject.go (1)
37-37: Add documentation for theEpochsKeeperfield inModuleInputs.To maintain consistency and clarity, consider adding comments to describe the
EpochsKeeperfield in theModuleInputsstruct.x/mint/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
53-53: Add documentation for theepochsKeeperfield inIntegrationTestSuite.To maintain consistency and clarity, consider adding comments to describe the
epochsKeeperfield in theIntegrationTestSuitestruct.x/mint/keeper/genesis_test.go (1)
57-57: Add documentation for theepochsKeeperfield inGenesisTestSuite.To maintain consistency and clarity, consider adding comments to describe the
epochsKeeperfield in theGenesisTestSuitestruct.x/mint/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1)
227-263: Add documentation for theMockEpochsKeeperstruct and its methods.To maintain consistency and clarity, consider adding comments to describe the
MockEpochsKeeperstruct and itsGetEpochInfomethod.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- x/epochs/keeper/epoch.go (1 hunks)
- x/mint/depinject.go (2 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/genesis_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/keeper_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/mint/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (9 hunks)
- x/mint/types/expected_keepers.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- x/mint/keeper/grpc_query_test.go
- x/mint/keeper/keeper.go
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (7)
x/mint/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/mint/depinject.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/epochs/keeper/epoch.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/mint/keeper/keeper_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/mint/keeper/genesis_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"x/mint/keeper/abci.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/mint/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (7)
x/mint/depinject.go (1)
71-71: Ensure proper error handling for theEpochsKeeperinitialization.Verify that the
EpochsKeeperis correctly initialized and handled in all relevant parts of the codebase.x/epochs/keeper/epoch.go (1)
10-18: Ensure proper error handling and logging for theGetEpochInfomethod.Consider adding logging for error cases to aid in debugging and monitoring.
x/mint/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
64-64: Ensure proper error handling for theepochsKeeperinitialization.Verify that the
epochsKeeperis correctly initialized and handled in all relevant parts of the test suite.x/mint/keeper/genesis_test.go (2)
62-62: Ensure proper error handling for theepochsKeeperinitialization.Verify that the
epochsKeeperis correctly initialized and handled in all relevant parts of the test suite.
Line range hint
67-82: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for the new genesis parameters.Verify that the new genesis parameters related to epochs are thoroughly tested, including edge cases and error scenarios.
x/mint/keeper/abci.go (2)
14-18: Ensure proper error handling and logging for theBeginBlocker2function.Consider adding logging for error cases to aid in debugging and monitoring.
40-126: Ensure proper error handling and logging for theBeginBlockerfunction.Consider adding logging for error cases to aid in debugging and monitoring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- x/mint/keeper/abci.go (1 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/genesis_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/mint/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- x/mint/keeper/abci.go
- x/mint/keeper/genesis_test.go
- x/mint/keeper/grpc_query_test.go
- x/mint/keeper/keeper.go
Description
Closes: #19952
Note: This work is referenced from osmosis
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
GetEpochInfoto retrieve epoch information.EpochsKeeperinModuleInputsandProvideModulefunction.BeginBlockerfunction inkeeper/abci.go.epochsKeeperin tests.LastReductionEpochin theKeeperstruct.expected_keepers_mocks.go.EpochsKeeperinterface withGetEpochInfomethod intypes/expected_keepers.go.