Added uuid extension to be able to generate uuids #1493
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This fixes #1101 which is a big issue for C# cookiecutters. @cookiecutter could you get this reviewed? |
|
Any news? I kind of need this feature. Thanks |
|
I think it might be better to review/merge #1240 instead which should provide this functionality and more. |
ssbarnea
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2021
Closed
cagonza6
pushed a commit
to cagonza6/cookiecutter
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2021
* Update extensions.py * Added tests and full function * fixed bug * fixed call * Fixed doc string * linting
|
This extension is not included in the latest release |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1101
I aiming to generate uuids from directly from jinja2. Ansible has an extension exactly like this.
These are only a few lines in non tighly coupled part. So this will not interfere with other parts of the application.
I guess you cloud add a custom extension for this as well but to be honest this is such a basic functionality, far more basic then the slugify extension.
A custom extension will always mean the cookiecutters are not very portable. Since the extension must be install as a python package on every client. (correct me if im wrong).
Thanks for the consideration.