Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"cms", "core", or "mediawiki-core" type? #390

Closed
davidbarratt opened this issue Mar 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

"cms", "core", or "mediawiki-core" type? #390

davidbarratt opened this issue Mar 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
question

Comments

@davidbarratt
Copy link
Contributor

davidbarratt commented Mar 22, 2018 •
edited

Would you prefer to add a generic cms type (that could be used for drupal/core and mediawiki/core) or would you prefer to add a mediawiki-core type?

or alternatively a core type, since both will be installed in a core folder within the webroot?

See https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T190386
@davidbarratt davidbarratt changed the title "cms" type or "mediawiki-core" "cms" type or "mediawiki-core"? Mar 22, 2018
@davidbarratt davidbarratt changed the title "cms" type or "mediawiki-core"? "cms", "core", or "mediawiki-core" type? Mar 22, 2018
@davidbarratt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@niksamokhvalov or @alcohol ?

@alcohol
Copy link
Member

alcohol commented Apr 5, 2018 •
edited

When it comes to installers, I would opt for more specific over generic. When you go with a generic solution, it means that once more than 1 vendor uses it, you can basically never change it. So, based on your suggestions, I would go with mediawiki-core.

@davidbarratt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! I opened #391

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alcohol @davidbarratt