New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion: In composer outdated
, mark the packages coming from my own composer.json
#10447
Comments
You can filter that with --direct, but maybe we could highlight them somehow. |
Note that it being a direct dependency does not however really mean that it's fully under your control, there might be a dependency on it from one of your dependencies which prevents an update. |
One idea worth investigating would be to split the list in two sections, things only required by composer.json and then the rest. It might be more readable than a |
Yes, but that other dependency might be in my Two lists: Yeah sure, the
So integrating the basics of |
The split in 2 lists would not be upgradable vs not upgradable, as computing that would actually require trying to do the update |
See #10779 |
When looking at the output of
composer outdated
, I'm always having the same question:composer.json
(which means I can update it myself right away)?So to make this more obvious, I'm suggesting to somehow "mark" the packages which are coming directly from
composer.json
(maybe with an asterisk, or however...)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: