Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

curious if there are plans for a release #433

Closed
smacke opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

curious if there are plans for a release #433

smacke opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@smacke
Copy link
Contributor

smacke commented Aug 5, 2021

Hi,

Thanks to the maintainers for starting this project -- it's hard to overstate the impact that cloudpickle has had in filling in the gaps of Python's built-in pickling capabilities, and one only needs to look at the pypistats for cloudpickle to see how important it has become in industry and other open source projects.

I was wondering if there are any plans for another release at some point -- I can see that there have been quite a lot of important developments since the last one, such as improved compatibility with Python 3.10. I don't mean to be pushy; as a maintainer of a few (far less impactful) open source projects myself, I know it's a thankless job. :) Just curious if there is a timeline in effect; no worries if not.

@pierreglaser
Copy link
Member

pierreglaser commented Aug 5, 2021

Hi @smacke. We plan to release cloudpickle within the next couple of weeks - before releasing, we typically check through tailored CI workflows that the newcloudpickle remains backwards-compatible with some widely used downstream libraries relying on cloudpickle, such as ray, dask and joblib. However, some of these workflows are broken, and need fixes (see #432 ). Once they are fixed, we can run the downstream tests, and once they pass, we will release cloudpickle 2.0.0.

@jrbourbeau
Copy link
Member

Just checking in, since the cloudpickle==2.0.0 release is out, can this issue be closed?

@pierreglaser
Copy link
Member

It can be closed indeed, thanks @jrbourbeau!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants