New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate if CC runs Ruby 3.X #2619
Labels
Comments
FloThinksPi
added
performance
PoC
Issue/PR that is part of a PoC to try out new things
labels
Jan 12, 2022
Thanks for linking that blog post. Would be very interesting to see if we can get comparable perf improvements from Truffleruby. |
see #2623 for a WIP on the Ruby 3 upgrade |
Closed
12 tasks
sethboyles
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2022
[#2619] Co-authored-by: Seth Boyles <sboyles@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Alex Rocha <alexr1@vmware.com>
moleske
added a commit
to cloudfoundry/capi-release
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2022
cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#2619 Co-authored-by: Alex Rocha <alexr1@vmware.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Oleske <moleske@pivotal.io>
3 tasks
sethboyles
added a commit
to cloudfoundry/capi-dockerfiles
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2022
* cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#2619 Co-authored-by: Michael Oleske <moleske@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Seth Boyles <sboyles@pivotal.io>
sethboyles
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2022
[#2619] Co-authored-by: Seth Boyles <sboyles@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Alex Rocha <alexr1@vmware.com>
sethboyles
pushed a commit
to cloudfoundry/capi-release
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2022
cloudfoundry/cloud_controller_ng#2619 Co-authored-by: Michael Oleske <moleske@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Alex Rocha <alexr1@vmware.com>
yjit available with config flag here: cloudfoundry/capi-release#270 |
will-gant
pushed a commit
to sap-contributions/cloud_controller_ng
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2022
[cloudfoundry#2619] Co-authored-by: Seth Boyles <sboyles@pivotal.io> Co-authored-by: Alex Rocha <alexr1@vmware.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Issue
Different sources claim alternative ruby implementations as well as CRuby 3.x do have a positive performance impact on rails applications that can be quite substantial.
Context
See https://eregon.me/blog/2022/01/06/benchmarking-cruby-mjit-yjit-jruby-truffleruby.html for reference to a benchmark comparing multiple ruby interpreters also with a rails application benchmark.
We should try out some of them firstly if they work and also if they improve overall performance in a mensurabel way.
Especially as CRuby 3.1 includes https://github.com/Shopify/yjit which promises improvements without loosing compatibility at all.
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: