New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Officia type definitions for 5.x? #1554
Comments
PRs welcome for adding official types. |
we could generate types via so maybe for now we just store hand written types alongside the sources? i can probably have a stab at it at some point |
I'm hesitant to ask, but... it's there any appetite for a contribution of a port of the source to TypeScript syntax? |
Tbh I would rather do that than work around it producing types from the js If everyone's up for that I can probably sort it out |
I could contribute too, though you might be faster. I wonder if given the existing npm scripts, if Wireit would be a good addition to make sure everything's built before other scripts that need that. |
Started a draft PR here. I'll be slogging through the types and trying to get them all done before the new year but who knows how long it will take :D Feel free to help out by making PRs against this one. |
I notice that there are no type definitions for the 5.x branch, here or in Definitely Typed. Is there a chance of getting official types with the 5.x releases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: