Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support google/ko attachments (sbom, signatures) #194

Open
DennisDenuto opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Support google/ko attachments (sbom, signatures) #194

DennisDenuto opened this issue Dec 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement This issue is a feature request priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@DennisDenuto
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the problem/challenge you have

google/ko produces sbom's when building an image. However kbld is hardcoded to publish images to the local docker daemon (via --local). Due to the docker daemon unable to store non-container manifests (such as sboms and signatures) these artifacts are dropped when using kbld with ko.

Describe the solution you'd like

Preserve attachment images such as sboms and signatures when using the google/ko builder


Vote on this request

This is an invitation to the community to vote on issues, to help us prioritize our backlog. Use the "smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

👍 "I would like to see this addressed as soon as possible"
👎 "There are other more important things to focus on right now"

We are also happy to receive and review Pull Requests if you want to help working on this issue.

@DennisDenuto DennisDenuto added enhancement This issue is a feature request carvel triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity labels Dec 1, 2021
@pivotaljohn pivotaljohn added priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed carvel triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity labels Jan 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This issue is a feature request priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
Status: To Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants