Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) registry+v1 bundles #1369

Open
ncdc opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Support Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) registry+v1 bundles #1369

ncdc opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
carvel-accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed enhancement This issue is a feature request priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@ncdc
Copy link

ncdc commented Oct 19, 2023

Describe the problem/challenge you have
The Operator Lifecycle Manager (OLM) is a project that aims to simplify lifecycle management of Kubernetes-native applications ("operators") and provide additional guardrails to prevent actions that can unintentionally or accidentally result in misconfigurations or data loss.

There is a large collection of operators that work with OLM. Many are viewable at https://operatorhub.io. OLM has a custom packaging format called registry+v1 that is an OCI image with a specific directory layout that OLM expects.

We are currently investigating using parts of the Carvel suite in our next major version of OLM, "v1", currently in development. kapp-controller is of particular interest. We'd like to use it to manage the content OLM applies to clusters, but kapp-controller doesn't currently support OLM's registry+v1 format.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add support for OLM's registry+v1 format as a "templating" step. This would take the contents of a .spec.fetch.image that points at an OLM registry+v1 image and process them in such a way that the .spec.deploy.kapp step can apply them to the cluster correctly.

Anything else you would like to add:
[Additional information that will assist in solving the issue.]


Vote on this request

This is an invitation to the community to vote on issues, to help us prioritize our backlog. Use the "smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

👍 "I would like to see this addressed as soon as possible"
👎 "There are other more important things to focus on right now"

We are also happy to receive and review Pull Requests if you want to help working on this issue.

@ncdc ncdc added carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity enhancement This issue is a feature request labels Oct 19, 2023
@renuy
Copy link

renuy commented Oct 31, 2023

@joaopapereira @praveenrewar
Please triage this.

@varshaprasad96
Copy link

Proposal to discuss the intended changes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ROxnv0ttzDGgjI_fIzdQAg0tcoefdcjVwpdM6LZyknE/edit

Copy link

This issue is being marked as stale due to a long period of inactivity and will be closed in 5 days if there is no response.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale This issue has had no activity for a while and will be closed soon label Dec 25, 2023
@praveenrewar praveenrewar removed the stale This issue has had no activity for a while and will be closed soon label Dec 26, 2023
@renuy renuy added carvel-accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity labels Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
carvel-accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed enhancement This issue is a feature request priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
Status: Prioritized Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants