This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 14, 2021. It is now read-only.
Fix bundle exec'ing to rubygems being silent
#7442
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
deivid-rodriguez
changed the title
bundle exec'ing to rubygems being silent
|
@bundlerbot merge |
ghost
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2019
7442: Fix `bundle exec`'ing to rubygems being silent r=deivid-rodriguez a=deivid-rodriguez ### What was the end-user problem that led to this PR? The problem was that #7401 caused a regression where `bundle exec`'ing to rubygems would silence rubygems output. ### What was your diagnosis of the problem? My diagnosis was that the removal of: * Code where `Bundler::RGProxy` would be only set conditionally on `Bundler.ui =` not being passed `nil`. * Code setting `Bundler.ui` to `nil` right before shelling during `bundle exec`. caused rubygems UI to be silent during `bundle exec gem`. ### What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR? My fix is to explictly "unsilence" rubygems UI before `bundle exec` calls. ### Why did you choose this fix out of the possible options? I chose this fix because it's more explicit than the previous one. Fixes #7441. Co-authored-by: David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net>
Build succeeded |
ghost
merged commit
deivid-rodriguez
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2019
7442: Fix `bundle exec`'ing to rubygems being silent r=deivid-rodriguez a=deivid-rodriguez ### What was the end-user problem that led to this PR? The problem was that #7401 caused a regression where `bundle exec`'ing to rubygems would silence rubygems output. ### What was your diagnosis of the problem? My diagnosis was that the removal of: * Code where `Bundler::RGProxy` would be only set conditionally on `Bundler.ui =` not being passed `nil`. * Code setting `Bundler.ui` to `nil` right before shelling during `bundle exec`. caused rubygems UI to be silent during `bundle exec gem`. ### What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR? My fix is to explictly "unsilence" rubygems UI before `bundle exec` calls. ### Why did you choose this fix out of the possible options? I chose this fix because it's more explicit than the previous one. Fixes #7441. Co-authored-by: David Rodríguez <deivid.rodriguez@riseup.net> (cherry picked from commit a11c104)
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was the end-user problem that led to this PR?
The problem was that #7401 caused a regression where
bundle exec'ing to rubygems would silence rubygems output.What was your diagnosis of the problem?
My diagnosis was that the removal of:
Bundler::RGProxywould be only set conditionally onBundler.ui =not being passednil.Bundler.uitonilright before shelling duringbundle exec.caused rubygems UI to be silent during
bundle exec gem.What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR?
My fix is to explictly "unsilence" rubygems UI before
bundle execcalls.Why did you choose this fix out of the possible options?
I chose this fix because it's more explicit than the previous one.
Fixes #7441.