Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

S3 backed vs Blob backed remote cache performance #748

Open
Ryang20718 opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

S3 backed vs Blob backed remote cache performance #748

Ryang20718 opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Ryang20718
Copy link

We currently have an S3 backed cache. Whilst we haven't profiled the performance vs a blob based remote cache performance, I was wondering whether there is a configuration suggestion that is recommended (assuming a lot of small files and some larger ones here and there) in terms of best performance?

@mostynb
Copy link
Collaborator

mostynb commented May 22, 2024

For best performance I recommend fast local storage (I tend to prefer XFS on linux), rather than using the proxy backends.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants