Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Django 1.11 to 2.2 codemods. #23

Open
charettes opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Django 1.11 to 2.2 codemods. #23

charettes opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@charettes
Copy link

Description

Hello @browniebroke thanks for this project it looks promising! I believe it can greatly accelerate the speed of adoptions of newly released versions of Django.

I was wondering if you'd be interested in receiving contributions for migration to versions between Django 1.11 LTS and 2.2 LTS. Even if these versions are not supported anymore I think it could be of interest to a lot of developers who are still in the process of upgrading.

I currently work for a company that is the process of doing so and also has a few Django 1.9/1.10 deprecation warnings that need to be addressed on a large project. Since we'll have to automate the process anyway I was wondering if you'd be interested in receiving contributions for these versions as well.

@browniebroke
Copy link
Owner

browniebroke commented May 10, 2020

Yes, I would definitely accept these contributions for these. We are running 2.2 at work, so earlier versions were not my primary use case, hence I focused on 3.0+.

I think it makes to support at least from 1.11 which has just gone out of support and I assume lot of people are still using.

@browniebroke browniebroke added the enhancement New feature or request label May 10, 2020
@jayvdb
Copy link
Contributor

jayvdb commented Jul 4, 2020

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants