Skip to content

Default indentifiers #3242

Answered by aaoswal
LadMartin asked this question in Q&A
Apr 26, 2022 · 3 comments · 10 replies
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @LadMartin,
On deeper analysis, I found that a better workaround might be to use UUID to generate a random ID and then append it to the bucket explicitly instead when making a function call.

The event system while useful in this case will not communicate the ID of the request back to client.create_bucket() as the BUCKET_NAME is passed implicitly through events, hence resulting in the bucket being created but the response being printed as empty as the create_bucket() method does not have the request ID to track the appropriate response for the same.

Hope this helps!

Replies: 3 comments 10 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
6 replies
@LadMartin
Comment options

@aaoswal
Comment options

@LadMartin
Comment options

@aaoswal
Comment options

@LadMartin
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@LadMartin
Comment options

@aaoswal
Comment options

@LadMartin
Comment options

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@LadMartin
Comment options

Answer selected by LadMartin
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
response-requested Waiting on additional information or feedback. guidance Question that needs advice or information.
2 participants