Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

72 tests ignored due to missing plan #110

Open
anderseknert opened this issue Aug 21, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #111
Open

72 tests ignored due to missing plan #110

anderseknert opened this issue Aug 21, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #111
Assignees
@johanfylling
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Jarl Development

Comments

@anderseknert
Copy link
Collaborator

While generated elsewhere, reporting here for tracking.

Ignoring functions/multi2 reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/basic call reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/skip-functions reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/omit result reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/false result reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/multi3 reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/ref func output reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/chained reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/default reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/cross package reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/always_true reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/array params reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/false else undefined reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/same package call reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/void good reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/false else negation reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/object params reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/nested complete doc with conflict reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/nested complete doc with conflict, else reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/nested function with conflict reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/nested function with conflict, else reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/nested function with conflict, else, no extra return reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/false result negation reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/void bad reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/multi4 reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/multi cross package reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/multi1 reason: no plan
Ignoring functions/false else value reason: no plan
@anderseknert anderseknert added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 21, 2022
@johanfylling johanfylling self-assigned this Aug 22, 2022
@johanfylling
Copy link
Collaborator

johanfylling commented Aug 22, 2022 •
edited

This is because of an issue in OPA: open-policy-agent/opa#5028

@anderseknert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

anderseknert commented Aug 22, 2022 •
edited

Now open-policy-agent/opa#4411 / open-policy-agent/opa#5035 😅

johanfylling added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2022
@johanfylling
Updating compliance tests to use prune-unused OPA compiler flag
b922705 
WIP: Need to figure out if use of this flag has negative impact on test coverage

Partially fixes #110

Signed-off-by: Johan Fylling <johan.dev@fylling.se>
@johanfylling johanfylling linked a pull request Aug 23, 2022 that will close this issue
Draft
@anderseknert anderseknert added this to To do in Jarl Development Oct 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@johanfylling johanfylling

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Jarl Development
To do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Updating compliance tests to use prune-unused OPA compiler flag borgeby/jarl
2 participants
@anderseknert @johanfylling