What set of b2 options builds the boost_stacktrace_from_exception library?

[bgemmill]

If I download boost 1.85, and go into stacktrace and do a build:

cd libs/stacktrace/build
../../../b2 'define=BOOST_STACKTRACE_BACKTRACE_INCLUDE_FILE=</usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/backtrace.h>' boost_stacktrace_from_exception
Performing configuration checks

    - default address-model    : none (cached) [1]
    - default architecture     : none (cached) [1]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [3]
    - libbacktrace builds      : no  (cached) [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [4]
    - libbacktrace builds      : no  (cached) [4]

[1] clang-18
[2] clang-linux-18/debug/python-3.10/visibility-hidden
[3] clang-linux-18/debug/link-static/python-3.10/visibility-hidden
[4] clang-linux-18/debug/build-no/python-3.10/visibility-hidden
...found 1 target...

libbacktrace isn't found and the boost_stacktrace_from_exception library won't be built.

Is there a better set of options to use here to build stacktrace?

[apolukhin]

Add -d+2 to the command line to get more information about the build.

For example:

boost/libs/stacktrace/build$ ../../../b2 'define=BOOST_STACKTRACE_BACKTRACE_INCLUDE_FILE=</usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/backtrace.h>' boost_stacktrace_from_exception -d+2
Performing configuration checks

    - default address-model    : 64-bit (cached) [1]
    - default architecture     : x86 (cached) [1]
    - symlinks supported       : yes (cached)
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes [2]

[1] gcc-9
[2] gcc-9/debug/threadapi-pthread/visibility-hidden
gcc.compile.c++ ../../../bin.v2/libs/stacktrace/build/gcc-9/debug/visibility-hidden/from_exception.o

    "g++"   -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fPIC -m64 -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -g -fvisibility=hidden  -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_STACKTRACE_BACKTRACE_INCLUDE_FILE=</usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/backtrace.h>  -I"../../.."  -c -o "../../../bin.v2/libs/stacktrace/build/gcc-9/debug/visibility-hidden/from_exception.o" "../../../libs/stacktrace/build/../src/from_exception.cpp"

/bin/sh: 2: cannot open /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/include/backtrace.h: No such file

What is the output in your case?

[bgemmill]

$ ../../../b2 'define=BOOST_STACKTRACE_BACKTRACE_INCLUDE_FILE=</usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/include/backtrace.h>' -d+2 boost_stacktrace_from_exception
Performing configuration checks

    - default address-model    : 64-bit (cached) [1]
    - default architecture     : x86 (cached) [1]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [3]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [3]
    - libbacktrace builds      : no  (cached) [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes (cached) [4]
    - libbacktrace builds      : no  (cached) [4]
    - addr2line builds         : yes (cached) [2]
    - addr2line builds         : yes (cached) [2]
    - WinDbg builds            : no  (cached) [2]
    - WinDbg builds            : no  (cached) [2]
    - WinDbg builds            : no  (cached) [4]
    - WinDbgCached builds      : no  (cached) [2]
    - WinDbgCached builds      : no  (cached) [4]

[1] clang-18
[2] clang-linux-18/debug/python-3.12/visibility-hidden
[3] clang-linux-18/debug/link-static/python-3.12/visibility-hidden
[4] clang-linux-18/debug/build-no/python-3.12/visibility-hidden

edit: copied the wrong output the first time.

Am I definining the location of backtrace correctly for b2 here?

[apolukhin]

LGTM

[apolukhin]

Add a -a along with -d+2 option, so that the cached values are recomputed. Attach the build log to this issue

[bgemmill]

Thanks for getting back to me. I see:

$ ../../../b2 -d+2 -a 'define=BOOST_STACKTRACE_BACKTRACE_INCLUDE_FILE=</usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/13/include/backtrace.h>' boost_stacktrace_from_exception
Performing configuration checks

    - default address-model    : none [1]
    - default architecture     : none [1]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes [3]
    - libbacktrace builds      : no [2]
    - cxx11_rvalue_references  : yes [4]
    - libbacktrace builds      : no [4]

[1] clang-18
[2] clang-linux-18/debug/python-3.12/visibility-hidden
[3] clang-linux-18/debug/link-static/python-3.12/visibility-hidden
[4] clang-linux-18/debug/build-no/python-3.12/visibility-hidden

This appears to output a 0 byte file called -DTEST_BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES.

Are there other build logs I should be looking for?

[apolukhin]

Changed the behavior in upstream in 2c83563

Just provide an explicit boost.stacktrace.from_exception=on option and the library should build... or output a readable error message