-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update qMRI to align with the new definition of derivatives #1812
Comments
Note the location of this definition of derivatives should probably be moved to common principles (maybe in the definition section) |
SuggestionAdapt the qmri appendix to align with the definition of derivatives. As far as I can tell this would not break backward compatibility as it only expands things that can go in raw dataset and also because it seems that any invalid dataset under the current reading of the BIDS spec for qMRI would not have been detected by the validator. |
pinging you, so you are not surprised if you get a PR to review. |
@Remi-Gau, thank you so much for looking into this, and sorry for being late to the party!
This reads great! Actually, this was something we originally wanted to mention in the proposal, but at that time it seemed like a detail and we decided not to push for it. I'm so glad that now is the time :) Having this separation is important and adds value. |
qmri appendix defines quantitative maps as derivatives regardless of how they were generated
https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/appendices/qmri.html#quantitative-maps-are-derivatives
One exception to this in the qMRI page is the recommendation to store scanner-generated UNIT1 files along with the raw data.
The schema files rules for quantitative maps under the rules for raw datasets.
bids-specification/src/schema/rules/files/raw/anat.yaml
Line 34 in 0950f6d
The legacy valiator (version 1.14.5) is completely fine with having those quantitative maps in a raw dataset (tested on several of the bids examples).
1 contradicts the operational definition of derivatives datasets that was agreed on in Copenhagen last year.
https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/derivatives/introduction.html#bids-derivatives
1 contradicts the behavior of the legacy validator (**3"") and, 1 and 2 tends to contradict each other as the schema seems to imply that quantitative maps are legit raw data (I would expect that the deno validator would behave the same as the legacy one given the schema).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: