Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make property operators extensible #35

Open
vincent-zurczak opened this issue Jan 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Make property operators extensible #35

vincent-zurczak opened this issue Jan 9, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@vincent-zurczak
Copy link
Member

#34 has introduced a new assertion type on property values.
We now have equality (« to be ») and regular expressions (« to match »). We could imagine other ones too.

If new ones had to appear, it would be nice to refactor the base regexp and not increase their number.
Said differently, we should think about an extensible grammar rather than copying the base regexp for the DETIK syntax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant