Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

March 2021 #71

Open
jridgewell opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 15 comments
Open

March 2021 #71

jridgewell opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 15 comments

Comments

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2021/03.md

@jridgewell jridgewell pinned this issue Mar 9, 2021
@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Introducing: Make B.1.{1,2} (octal literals & escapes) normative for sloppy code reaches consensus

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Top-level await status update: Consensus for bugfix, will revisit the more controversial one tomorrow.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Module Fragments (For Stage 1) reaches Stage 1

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Collection normalization methods doesn't split, will try to use an XOR in Sets.

@zloirock
Copy link
Member

Collection normalization methods doesn't split, will try to use an XOR in Sets.

What do you mean by XOR?

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

You can have either have coerceKey or coerceValue (or neither), but not both.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Error.prototype.cause for stage 3 reaches Stage 3

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

PR: Add Promise.anySettled and make Promise.race its alias did not reach consensus

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Array find from last reaches Stage 2

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

ResizableArrayBuffer for Stage 3 does not reach Stage 3, but good work done

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

Top-level await PR reached consensus

@jridgewell
Copy link
Member Author

jridgewell commented Mar 10, 2021

Temporal moves to Stage 3, removing affordances for subclassing, compare method will not use calendar or timezone

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Mar 11, 2021

Additionally, all implementations present agree to not ship temporal unflagged, pending the outcome of some IETF format decisions.

@jridgewell jridgewell unpinned this issue Jul 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants