New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove lodash from babel-compat-data #13024
Conversation
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 02fbf1b:
|
Build successful! You can test your changes in the REPL here: https://babeljs.io/repl/build/44519/ |
return array.reduce((flattened, value) => { | ||
return flattened.concat(value); | ||
}, []); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could just bump the Node.js version requirement for building Babel to 12 (currently it's 10 I think), and avoid the polyfill.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that will be a breaking change, wdyt about doing this for babel8?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not a breaking change, it's just the minimum Node.js versions used when building Babel (it doesn't affect the code published on npm, which is subject to semver).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, the minimum Node.js version is already 12 since many scripts we use are native ES modules. We can remove the polyfill without problems.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's good, because I forgot to call cb
in this polyfill….. 😅
Re: #11726