feat(aws-lambda): Generates a version when currentVersionOptions is set #23225
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
github-actions
bot
added
effort/small
comcalvi
previously approved these changes
Dec 5, 2022
mergify
bot
dismissed
comcalvi’s stale review
Pull request has been modified.
comcalvi
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2022
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
|
Thanks @marciocadev |
brennanho
pushed a commit
to brennanho/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2022
…et (aws#23225) ## Description Specifying `currentVersionOptions` for a `Function` has no effect unless the `currentVersion` method is called. ## Solution when defining a `currentVersionOptions` a new version will be created automatically, without the need to execute `currentVersion` method. Fixes aws#23002 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
4 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2023
…ion` resource (#23636) In #23225, we automatically created a `currentVersion` Version object if the `currentVersionOptions` property was specified. However, this breaks the case where a user both: * Specifies `currentVersionOptions` * Never calls `currentVersion` but instead creates a `Version` object directly. In that case, 2 `Version` resources are created, but the second one fails because Lambda will not allow creating a new Version if nothing changed since the last Version. Reverting that change. ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
kylelaker
added a commit
to kylelaker/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2023
The AWS CDK uses conventional commits which encourage a scope. In nearly all cases, contributors omit the `aws-` prefix; though there are some situations where they're included (such as aws#23552, aws#23225, and others). Interestingly, it seems that most often the `aws-` prefix is used for chore/doc commits that don't end up in changelogs anyway. This actually results in inconsistencies for users in the changelog. Because the changelog sorts entries alphabetically by scope, changes that were contributed with `aws-s3` as the scope are listed at the top of the changelog whereas changes that just used `s3` are sorted further down. This means it's harder for users to review one (or I suppose 2 with Feature/Fix being separate sections) spots in the changelog to identify specific modules they care about. It's also possible that rather than potentially annoying contributors who have to edit their titles, this should be automatically fixed up in the changelog generation. The current behavior may also accidentally encourage users to scan the whole changelog rather than just a few bits of it. So it's very understandable if the potential inconvenience from this change it's worth the minor formatting consistency gain.
kylelaker
added a commit
to kylelaker/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2023
The AWS CDK uses conventional commits which encourage a scope. In nearly all cases, contributors omit the `aws-` prefix; though there are some situations where they're included (such as aws#23552, aws#23225, and others). Interestingly, it seems that most often the `aws-` prefix is used for chore/doc commits that don't end up in changelogs anyway. This actually results in inconsistencies for users in the changelog. Because the changelog sorts entries alphabetically by scope, changes that were contributed with `aws-s3` as the scope are listed at the top of the changelog whereas changes that just used `s3` are sorted further down. This means it's harder for users to review one (or I suppose 2 with Feature/Fix being separate sections) spots in the changelog to identify specific modules they care about. It's also possible that rather than potentially annoying contributors who have to edit their titles, this should be automatically fixed up in the changelog generation. The current behavior may also accidentally encourage users to scan the whole changelog rather than just a few bits of it. So it's very understandable if the potential inconvenience from this change it's worth the minor formatting consistency gain.
4 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2023
The AWS CDK uses conventional commits which encourage a scope. In nearly all cases, contributors omit the `aws-` prefix; though there are some situations where they're included (such as #23552, #23225, and others). Interestingly, it seems that most often the `aws-` prefix is used for chore/doc commits that don't end up in changelogs anyway. This actually results in inconsistencies for users in the changelog. Because the changelog sorts entries alphabetically by scope, changes that were contributed with `aws-s3` as the scope are listed at the top of the changelog whereas changes that just used `s3` are sorted further down. This means it's harder for users to review one (or I suppose 2 with Feature/Fix being separate sections) spots in the changelog to identify specific modules they care about. It's also possible that rather than potentially annoying contributors who have to edit their titles, this should be automatically fixed up in the changelog generation. The current behavior may also accidentally encourage users to scan the whole changelog rather than just a few bits of it. So it's very understandable if the potential inconvenience from this change it's worth the minor formatting consistency gain. ---- ### All Submissions: * [X] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
brennanho
pushed a commit
to brennanho/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2023
…et (aws#23225) ## Description Specifying `currentVersionOptions` for a `Function` has no effect unless the `currentVersion` method is called. ## Solution when defining a `currentVersionOptions` a new version will be created automatically, without the need to execute `currentVersion` method. Fixes aws#23002 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
brennanho
pushed a commit
to brennanho/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2023
…et (aws#23225) ## Description Specifying `currentVersionOptions` for a `Function` has no effect unless the `currentVersion` method is called. ## Solution when defining a `currentVersionOptions` a new version will be created automatically, without the need to execute `currentVersion` method. Fixes aws#23002 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new construct runtime dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-construct-runtime-dependencies) ### New Features * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Specifying
currentVersionOptionsfor aFunctionhas no effect unless thecurrentVersionmethod is called.Solution
when defining a
currentVersionOptionsa new version will be created automatically, without the need to executecurrentVersionmethod.Fixes #23002
All Submissions:
Adding new Construct Runtime Dependencies:
New Features
yarn integto deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.yarn integwithout--dry-run)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license