Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove gltm.yml #10726

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

AllanZhengYP
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

Remove unnecessary LGTM config as the service is deprecated. More context in #10725

Issue #, if available

Blocked by #10725

Description of how you validated changes

N/A

Checklist

  • PR description included
  • yarn test passes
  • Tests are changed or added
  • Relevant documentation is changed or added (and PR referenced)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #10726 (d03b371) into main (b1562e7) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #10726   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.71%   85.71%           
=======================================
  Files         196      196           
  Lines       18335    18335           
  Branches     3900     3900           
=======================================
  Hits        15715    15715           
  Misses       2544     2544           
  Partials       76       76           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP marked this pull request as ready for review November 30, 2022 23:05
@AllanZhengYP AllanZhengYP requested a review from a team as a code owner November 30, 2022 23:05
Copy link
Contributor

@elorzafe elorzafe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

Thanks @AllanZhengYP

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants