You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When attempting to deploy an older version of the App, we select the older deployment and then click the redeploy button.
The behaviour we are seeing is that no matter which older deployment we select, it is always the latest deployment that is deployed.
It clones the repository and then we see check out the commit hash from the latest successful deployment, rather than the older one we were trying to select (we were trying to roll back the app).
In the older version of the UI the older commit hash would have been selected and the older app version of the app would have been deployed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@petetrickey thanks for reaching out. We have identified this as a bug and have prioritized a fix for it. We are actively working on it and will keep you posted with any updates. In the meantime, as a workaround you can use the start-job CLI command to redeploy an existing job:
For anyone trying the CLI workaround, the new Amplify UI hides the job ID, but you can dig it up in the "Deploy" accordion and you'll see it listed as "buildId" in the logs.
In addition, you'll need to specify --branch-name on the command as well.
Environment information
Description
When attempting to deploy an older version of the App, we select the older deployment and then click the
redeploy
button.The behaviour we are seeing is that no matter which older deployment we select, it is always the latest deployment that is deployed.
It clones the repository and then we see check out the commit hash from the latest successful deployment, rather than the older one we were trying to select (we were trying to roll back the app).
In the older version of the UI the older commit hash would have been selected and the older app version of the app would have been deployed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: