"# noqa-next: XYZ" ? #10902
"# noqa-next: XYZ" ?
#10902
-
|
I know from pylint that I can disable the next occurrence of an error via I coulnd't found something like this for ruff. It often violates my 80-chars-line-length-limit when I set a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
MichaReiser
Apr 12, 2024
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I see the appeal to this. We want to rework our suppression comments and allow more flexible suppressions (e.g. for a block #3711) and unify them across our tools (the formatter, isort, and the linter all use different suppression comments). But it will probably be a while before we have the time to work on this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
buhtz
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I see the appeal to this. We want to rework our suppression comments and allow more flexible suppressions (e.g. for a block #3711) and unify them across our tools (the formatter, isort, and the linter all use different suppression comments). But it will probably be a while before we have the time to work on this.