Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Enhancement] Migrate integration tests to Jakarta namespace #1391

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
lprimak opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

[Enhancement] Migrate integration tests to Jakarta namespace #1391

lprimak opened this issue Mar 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
jakartaee Jakarta EE tests
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@lprimak
Copy link
Contributor

lprimak commented Mar 30, 2024 •
edited

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Enhancement Request

Currently, due to integration tests relying on older Java EE namespace, forces the use of obsolete and unmaintained app servers to run. If the IT tests were migrated to Jakarta EE namespace, the latest app servers could be used.
Relates to #1351
Blocks #1381

Describe the solution you'd like

Migrate the tests

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@lprimak lprimak added this to the Backlog milestone Mar 30, 2024
@lprimak lprimak mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2024
Open
2 tasks
@lprimak lprimak added jakartaee Jakarta EE tests labels Apr 6, 2024
@lprimak
Copy link
Contributor Author

lprimak commented Apr 11, 2024

Tried it, but it turned out to be too difficult:

  • JaCoCo doesn't work due to different classes being IT-tested vs. unit tested
  • It's easier just to wait. JDK 21 will be around for a long time

@lprimak lprimak closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
jakartaee Jakarta EE tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lprimak