Producer getting producer busy is removing existing producer from list #11804
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
merlimat
requested review from
rdhabalia,
jerrypeng,
hangc0276 and
codelipenghui
merlimat
added
type/bug
hangc0276
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2021
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2021
hangc0276
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2021
#11804) ### Motivation When a producer is getting error because of ProducerBusy (existing producer with the same name), it will trigger a producer close operation that will eventually lead to the existing producer getting removed from the topic map (even though that producer is still writing on the topic). The problem is the producer close is triggering a removal from the map: pulsar/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractTopic.java Line 683 in 43ded59 if (producers.remove(producer.getProducerName(), producer)) { Even though we check for producer equality, the Producer.equals() is only comparing the producer name, so the old instance gets removed from the map. Instead, the equality of producer needs to be based on the connection id (local & remote addresses and unique id), plus the producer id within that connection. * Producer getting producer busy is removing existing producer from list * Fixed test (cherry picked from commit 6aef83f)
BewareMyPower
added a commit
to streamnative/kop
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2021
### Motivation apache/pulsar#11804 added the custom implementations of `equals` and `hashCode` methods of `ServiceCnx`, which made KoP's spotbugs check fail with > Medium: io.streamnative.pulsar.handlers.kop.InternalServerCnx doesn't override org.apache.pulsar.broker.service.ServerCnx.equals(Object) [io.streamnative.pulsar.handlers.kop.InternalServerCnx] At InternalServerCnx.java:[line 1] EQ_DOESNT_OVERRIDE_EQUALS ### Modifications This PR adds the overrided `equals` and `hashCode` methods by calling base class' same name methods simply. On the other hand, since the new `equals` and `hashCode` methods are based on `ctx` field and they are called when removing `Producer` from `Topic`, this PR also updates the `ctx` field of `InternalServerCnx`.
1 task
nicoloboschi
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2021
apache#11804) When a producer is getting error because of ProducerBusy (existing producer with the same name), it will trigger a producer close operation that will eventually lead to the existing producer getting removed from the topic map (even though that producer is still writing on the topic). The problem is the producer close is triggering a removal from the map: pulsar/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractTopic.java Line 683 in 43ded59 if (producers.remove(producer.getProducerName(), producer)) { Even though we check for producer equality, the Producer.equals() is only comparing the producer name, so the old instance gets removed from the map. Instead, the equality of producer needs to be based on the connection id (local & remote addresses and unique id), plus the producer id within that connection. * Producer getting producer busy is removing existing producer from list * Fixed test (cherry picked from commit 6aef83f)
nicoloboschi
pushed a commit
to datastax/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2021
apache#11804) ### Motivation When a producer is getting error because of ProducerBusy (existing producer with the same name), it will trigger a producer close operation that will eventually lead to the existing producer getting removed from the topic map (even though that producer is still writing on the topic). The problem is the producer close is triggering a removal from the map: pulsar/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractTopic.java Line 683 in 43ded59 if (producers.remove(producer.getProducerName(), producer)) { Even though we check for producer equality, the Producer.equals() is only comparing the producer name, so the old instance gets removed from the map. Instead, the equality of producer needs to be based on the connection id (local & remote addresses and unique id), plus the producer id within that connection. * Producer getting producer busy is removing existing producer from list * Fixed test (cherry picked from commit 6aef83f)
This was referenced Dec 1, 2021
Open
codelipenghui
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2021
#11804) ### Motivation When a producer is getting error because of ProducerBusy (existing producer with the same name), it will trigger a producer close operation that will eventually lead to the existing producer getting removed from the topic map (even though that producer is still writing on the topic). The problem is the producer close is triggering a removal from the map: pulsar/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractTopic.java Line 683 in 43ded59 if (producers.remove(producer.getProducerName(), producer)) { Even though we check for producer equality, the Producer.equals() is only comparing the producer name, so the old instance gets removed from the map. Instead, the equality of producer needs to be based on the connection id (local & remote addresses and unique id), plus the producer id within that connection. * Producer getting producer busy is removing existing producer from list * Fixed test (cherry picked from commit 6aef83f)
bharanic-dev
pushed a commit
to bharanic-dev/pulsar
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
apache#11804) ### Motivation When a producer is getting error because of ProducerBusy (existing producer with the same name), it will trigger a producer close operation that will eventually lead to the existing producer getting removed from the topic map (even though that producer is still writing on the topic). The problem is the producer close is triggering a removal from the map: pulsar/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractTopic.java Line 683 in 43ded59 if (producers.remove(producer.getProducerName(), producer)) { Even though we check for producer equality, the Producer.equals() is only comparing the producer name, so the old instance gets removed from the map. Instead, the equality of producer needs to be based on the connection id (local & remote addresses and unique id), plus the producer id within that connection. * Producer getting producer busy is removing existing producer from list * Fixed test
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
When a producer is getting error because of ProducerBusy (existing producer with the same name), it will trigger a producer close operation that will eventually lead to the existing producer getting removed from the topic map (even though that producer is still writing on the topic).
The problem is the producer close is triggering a removal from the map:
pulsar/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/AbstractTopic.java
Line 683 in 43ded59
Even though we check for producer equality, the
Producer.equals()is only comparing the producer name, so the old instance gets removed from the map.Instead, the equality of producer needs to be based on the connection id (local & remote addresses and unique id), plus the producer id within that connection.