Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failed to flush mark-delete position #16237

Closed
xuesongxs opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Failed to flush mark-delete position #16237

xuesongxs opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
type/bug The PR fixed a bug or issue reported a bug

Comments

@xuesongxs
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
Pulsar v2.8.1
broker log:
[pulsar/iot/persistent/19_rate_merge-partition-0][consumer19] Failed to flush mark-delete position
org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.ManagedLedgerException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Mark deleting an already mark-deleted position
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Mark deleting an already mark-deleted position
at org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedCursorImpl.setAcknowledgedPosition(ManagedCursorImpl.java:1580) ~[org.apache.pulsar-managed-ledger-2.8.1.jar:2.8.1]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedCursorImpl.asyncMarkDelete(ManagedCursorImpl.java:1718) ~[org.apache.pulsar-managed-ledger-2.8.1.jar:2.8.1]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedCursorImpl.flush(ManagedCursorImpl.java:3026) ~[org.apache.pulsar-managed-ledger-2.8.1.jar:2.8.1]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl.lambda$flushCursors$1(ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl.java:212) ~[org.apache.pulsar-managed-ledger-2.8.1.jar:2.8.1]
at java.lang.Iterable.forEach(Iterable.java:75) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl.lambda$flushCursors$2(ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl.java:212) ~[org.apache.pulsar-managed-ledger-2.8.1.jar:2.8.1]
at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$ValuesView.forEach(ConcurrentHashMap.java:4707) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl.flushCursors(ManagedLedgerFactoryImpl.java:208) ~[org.apache.pulsar-managed-ledger-2.8.1.jar:2.8.1]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.common.util.SafeRunnable.run(SafeRunnable.java:36) ~[org.apache.bookkeeper-bookkeeper-common-4.14.2.jar:4.14.2]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.common.util.OrderedExecutor$TimedRunnable.run(OrderedExecutor.java:203) ~[org.apache.bookkeeper-bookkeeper-common-4.14.2.jar:4.14.2]
at org.apache.bookkeeper.common.util.OrderedExecutor$TimedRunnable.run(OrderedExecutor.java:203) ~[org.apache.bookkeeper-bookkeeper-common-4.14.2.jar:4.14.2]
at com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$ScheduledListeningDecorator$NeverSuccessfulListenableFutureTask.run(MoreExecutors.java:705) ~[com.google.guava-guava-30.1-jre.jar:?]
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) ~[?:1.8.0_151]
at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30) ~[io.netty-netty-common-4.1.66.Final.jar:4.1.66.Final]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) ~[?:1.8.0_151]

@xuesongxs xuesongxs added the type/bug The PR fixed a bug or issue reported a bug label Jun 27, 2022
@Technoboy- Technoboy- self-assigned this Jun 27, 2022
@Technoboy- Technoboy- removed their assignment Jul 25, 2022
@Technoboy-
Copy link
Contributor

#14261 #15031 may fix this issue. Suggest to upgrade to v2.8.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/bug The PR fixed a bug or issue reported a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants