New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SUREFIRE-2012] Use maven-shared-utils instead of surefire-shared-utils in Report Parser. Removed commons-lang in Report Plugin. #470
Conversation
@slawekjaranowski |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
great - I dream about removing surefire-shared-utils
(maven-shared-utils) at all 😃
surefire-report-parser/pom.xml
Outdated
<parent> | ||
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>surefire</artifactId> | ||
<version>3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT</version> | ||
</parent> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is indentation correct ... looks like change from 2 -> 4 space?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
4 is correct
I am using Maven profile in IDEA.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@slawekjaranowski
But maven-shared-utils has CLI class, platform specific impl. We need it. Other classes are minor. If we could extract only that as sources and not bytecode, and if we substituted DirectoryScanner
with NIO Files, then yes, it would be possible to get right of shaded classes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is not much methods and classes we use, we can write our own, few util methods. The problem is with CLI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about surefire-shared-utils
not maven-shared-utils ...
I now there are place where we must shade package from maven-shared-utils and other but I hope it can be done in the last module in the tree where maven-shared-utils is used ... but it is another story
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@slawekjaranowski
We shade the maven-shared-utils
into surefire-shared-utils
, and much more.
I can imaging the dependency maven-shared-utils
with type sources
extracting CLI classes to generated sources, and adding new DirectoryScanner
based on NIO in src/main/java
. This can be done but you need to have a spare time to write unit tests for the scaner and several trivial utility methods.
@slawekjaranowski |
…ls in Report Parser. Removed commons-lang in Report Plugin.
6253914
to
79ae093
Compare
@slawekjaranowski |
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not
require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
pulling in other changes.
[SUREFIRE-XXX] - Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles
,where you replace
SUREFIRE-XXX
with the appropriate JIRA issue. Best practiceis to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the first line of the
commit message.
mvn clean install
to make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check willbe performed on your pull request automatically.
mvn -Prun-its clean install
).If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.
To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
[ x] I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.