Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

temporal conversion functions should work on negative input properly #2326

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Aug 5, 2022

Conversation

viirya
Copy link
Member

@viirya viirya commented Aug 4, 2022

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #2325.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the arrow Changes to the arrow crate label Aug 4, 2022
Copy link
Member Author

@viirya viirya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The input to time32ms_to_time etc seems to be positive, so I don't touch them.

Copy link
Contributor

@tustvold tustvold left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we revert the change to the integration test to remove negative inputs now?

};
use chrono::NaiveDateTime;

#[test]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it worth a test of an exact number of seconds, to check the branch in split_seconds?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I will add a few more tests.

@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Aug 5, 2022

Can we revert the change to the integration test to remove negative inputs now?

yea

@viirya viirya merged commit 3ed0e28 into apache:master Aug 5, 2022
@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Aug 5, 2022

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 50d1e5f and contender = 3ed0e28. 3ed0e28 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-rs-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

///
#[inline]
pub(crate) fn split_second(v: i64, base: i64) -> (i64, u32) {
if v < 0 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be possible to simplify this using builtin div_euclid / rem_euclid functions

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me try if it works. Thanks @jhorstmann

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arrow Changes to the arrow crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

temporal conversion functions cannot work on negative input properly
4 participants