PROVIDER_ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md.jinja2

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you help us to test the RC versions of the providers and let us know in the comment,
if the issue is addressed there.

## Providers that need testing

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

{% for provider_id, provider_pr_info in interesting_providers.items()  %}
### Provider [{{ provider_id }}: {{ provider_pr_info.provider_details.versions[0] }}{{ suffix }}](https://pypi.org/project/{{ provider_pr_info.provider_details.pypi_package_name }}/{{ provider_pr_info.provider_details.versions[0] }}{{ suffix }})
{%- for pr in provider_pr_info.pr_list %}
   - [ ] [{{ pr.title }} (#{{ pr.number }})]({{ pr.html_url }}): @{{ pr.user.login }}
{%- endfor %}
{%- endfor %}

## Providers that do not need testing

Those are providers that were either doc-only or had changes that do not require testing.

{% for provider_id, provider_pr_info in non_interesting_providers.items()  %}
* Provider [{{ provider_id }}: {{ provider_pr_info.provider_details.versions[0] }}{{ suffix }}](https://pypi.org/project/{{ provider_pr_info.provider_details.pypi_package_name }}/{{ provider_pr_info.provider_details.versions[0] }}{{ suffix }})
{%- endfor %}

<!--

NOTE TO RELEASE MANAGER:

Please move here the providers that have doc-only changes or for which changes are trivial and
you could asses that they are OK. In case

The providers are automatically installed on Airflow 2.1 and latest `main` during the CI, so we know they
are installable. Also all classes within the providers are imported during the CI run so we know all
providers can be imported.

-->