Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow ansible-galaxy to "git init" roles #6773

Closed
chikamichi opened this issue Mar 31, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Allow ansible-galaxy to "git init" roles #6773

chikamichi opened this issue Mar 31, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@chikamichi
Copy link

Issue Type:

Feature Idea

Ansible Version:

ansible 1.6 (devel f82ac9f) last updated 2014/03/22 17:11:12 (GMT +200)

Environment:

Linux *** 3.5.0-47-generic #71-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 19 00:00:07 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Summary:

I don't know where to provide feedback about ansible-galaxy, an issue might be inappropriate: feel free to move/remove.

When installing roles from the galaxy using ansible-galaxy, I often find myself willing to edit the roles (README typos, code kinks…). This requires manually setting a git tracking (git init, git add remote upstream [github-url-as-seen-on-the-galaxy]).

ansible-galaxy could be configured using an Ansible option (disabled by default) to do just that, so that contributing to the galaxy codebase is made even easier.

I guess the added origin should be named upstream, as illustrated by the GitHub help page on the subject so that people can easily fork (=> git add remote origin git@github.com:me/fork), edit, and send PR to the upstream.

Steps To Reproduce:

N/A

Expected Results:

N/A

Actual Results:

N/A

@mpdehaan
Copy link
Contributor

I'd consider pull requests for something like this.

@chikamichi
Copy link
Author

Good to know. Thank you for your feedback!

@ansible ansible locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 24, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants