Skip to content

fix(material/table): increase specificity on sticky selector #21403

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2021

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Dec 20, 2020

The sticky styles were switched to a class in #19823 which has a very low specificity. As a result, there's a high chance of it being overwritten by some user styles.

These changes use !important so that we get a similar specificity as when the styles were being set inline before #19823.

Fixes #20558.

cc @kseamon

@crisbeto crisbeto added P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Dec 20, 2020
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Dec 20, 2020
The sticky styles were switched to a class in angular#19823 which has a very low specificity.
As a result, there's a high chance of it being overwritten by some user styles.

These changes use `!important` so that we get a similar specificity as when the styles
were being set inline before angular#19823.

Fixes angular#20558.
@crisbeto crisbeto force-pushed the 20558/sticky-table-specificity branch from 52df086 to ca4514b Compare December 20, 2020 15:33
@crisbeto crisbeto requested a review from jelbourn as a code owner December 20, 2020 15:33
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Jan 5, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewseguin andrewseguin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@annieyw annieyw merged commit 1f18750 into angular:master Jan 9, 2021
annieyw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2021
The sticky styles were switched to a class in #19823 which has a very low specificity.
As a result, there's a high chance of it being overwritten by some user styles.

These changes use `!important` so that we get a similar specificity as when the styles
were being set inline before #19823.

Fixes #20558.

(cherry picked from commit 1f18750)
wagnermaciel pushed a commit to wagnermaciel/components that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2021

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature. The key has expired.
BridgeAR Ruben Bridgewater
…#21403)

The sticky styles were switched to a class in angular#19823 which has a very low specificity.
As a result, there's a high chance of it being overwritten by some user styles.

These changes use `!important` so that we get a similar specificity as when the styles
were being set inline before angular#19823.

Fixes angular#20558.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 9, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug(material/table): position sticky has very low specificity after this commit
4 participants