New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New maintainer needed #198
Comments
Is there a different library you recommend with similar functionality? |
The only other run-time type checker library that is currently maintained is Beartype. But a new major release of typguard is coming (there are betas out already), so you don't need to switch just yet. |
@agronholm So you have more time to maintain this project, now? |
I'm juggling projects, as usual. Once v4.0.0 has more or less stabilized, I'm switching to another project and won't be touching this one for a while (sans maybe some low effort bugfixes). If somebody volunteered to spend more time on this project, that would be great. |
@agronholm I'm willing to maintain this project. I actually wrote a runtime type checker as a decorator function at work before switching to use this. Would be happy to maintain it for you. |
Fantastic! Are you sure you're not intimidated by the sheer amount of magic the instrumentation code does? 😄 But really, this would be a load off my back. I could hand over the reins once the dust settles on v4.0. |
@fractionalhare Now with v4.0.0 final out, would you still be willing to take on maintainership? |
I currently don't have the resources to maintain this project. If someone is willing to put in the time to do it, I'm willing to assign the necessary privileges to that person. If you're willing to do this, reply on this issue or send me email.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: