Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New maintainer needed #198

Open
agronholm opened this issue Aug 4, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

New maintainer needed #198

agronholm opened this issue Aug 4, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@agronholm
Copy link
Owner

I currently don't have the resources to maintain this project. If someone is willing to put in the time to do it, I'm willing to assign the necessary privileges to that person. If you're willing to do this, reply on this issue or send me email.

@idvorkin
Copy link

Is there a different library you recommend with similar functionality?

@agronholm
Copy link
Owner Author

The only other run-time type checker library that is currently maintained is Beartype. But a new major release of typguard is coming (there are betas out already), so you don't need to switch just yet.

@jedie
Copy link

jedie commented Apr 4, 2023

@agronholm So you have more time to maintain this project, now?

@agronholm
Copy link
Owner Author

I'm juggling projects, as usual. Once v4.0.0 has more or less stabilized, I'm switching to another project and won't be touching this one for a while (sans maybe some low effort bugfixes). If somebody volunteered to spend more time on this project, that would be great.

@fractionalhare
Copy link

@agronholm I'm willing to maintain this project. I actually wrote a runtime type checker as a decorator function at work before switching to use this. Would be happy to maintain it for you.

@agronholm
Copy link
Owner Author

@agronholm I'm willing to maintain this project. I actually wrote a runtime type checker as a decorator function at work before switching to use this. Would be happy to maintain it for you.

Fantastic! Are you sure you're not intimidated by the sheer amount of magic the instrumentation code does? 😄

But really, this would be a load off my back. I could hand over the reins once the dust settles on v4.0.

@agronholm
Copy link
Owner Author

@fractionalhare Now with v4.0.0 final out, would you still be willing to take on maintainership?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants