New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Steps coming out ugly #131
Comments
Enable debug and run again... Set the ACTIONS_STEP_DEBUG secret to true. |
Thanks for the quick response. Here's the output:
Is it because we haven't named the steps, maybe? |
Yes, I'm surprised it displayed the steps at all -- GitHub must have changed something. From the README ...
|
Has anyone figured out what the extra alphanumeric ID refers? I have multiple steps defined by IDs (per the docs), and they all show up as expected, plus this garbage one first. |
This is happening to me as well. Same issue, same outputs. I am using v1.2.2. |
@rpherrera I think it has something to do with using a matrix of job configurations. Are you using |
@satterly nope. Here is how I am using it:
I have tried all the previous tags all the way to the very first release and the outputs are roughly the same:
Thanks for answering promptly, by the way. |
Any new updates for this issue? :( |
This functionality works if you add |
That is only true for steps after the 0th. As an example:
Result: And sometimes still more than one:
|
I think I've figured this out. When I run a workflow on a Github-hosted runner, I don't get the extra garbage step, and the list of steps in the UI is:
But when I run the exact same workflow on a self-hosted runner, I get the extra step, and the list is:
My hypothesis is that the "Set up runner" step does not have an ID assigned and that's where this extra step/hash is coming from. |
Unfortunately, I have only ever used GitHub-hosted runners and see the results above. |
I've added your lovely plugin to our build as advised in the readme, but we're seeing something a bit disappointing in the "steps" output in Slack:
Any idea what we're doing wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: