You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note: New issues raised, where it is clear the submitter has not read the issue template, are likely to be closed with "please read the issue template". Please don't take offense at this. It is simply a time management decision. If someone raises an issue, and can't be bothered to spend the time to read the issue template, then the project maintainers should not be expected to spend the time to read the submitted issue. Often too much time is spent going back and forth in issue comments asking for information that is outlined in the issue template.
Preamble
General questions may be better placed StackOveflow.
Where relevant, ensure you are using the current stable versions on your development stack. For example:
Any code or stack traces must be properly formatted with GitHub markdown.
Describe the bug
Hello there!
When I combine Verify.Xunit with xunit.assert.source package, the Assert class results in a conflict.
If you don't know, this packages allows you to define custom assert which is needed by our project.
This problem is in many repositories and there is an easy fix normally by simply reducing the nuget references.
Is it possible that the xunit.assert reference could be removed?
If not, would it be possible to use the xunit.assert.source package instead?
Minimal Repro
Simply install xunit.assert.source and Verify.Xunit package in one project
Submit a PR that fixes the bug
Submit a Pull Request (PR) that fixes the bug. Include in this PR a test that verifies the fix. If you were not able to fix the bug, a PR that illustrates your partial progress will suffice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note: New issues raised, where it is clear the submitter has not read the issue template, are likely to be closed with "please read the issue template". Please don't take offense at this. It is simply a time management decision. If someone raises an issue, and can't be bothered to spend the time to read the issue template, then the project maintainers should not be expected to spend the time to read the submitted issue. Often too much time is spent going back and forth in issue comments asking for information that is outlined in the issue template.
Preamble
General questions may be better placed StackOveflow.
Where relevant, ensure you are using the current stable versions on your development stack. For example:
Any code or stack traces must be properly formatted with GitHub markdown.
Describe the bug
Hello there!
When I combine Verify.Xunit with xunit.assert.source package, the Assert class results in a conflict.
If you don't know, this packages allows you to define custom assert which is needed by our project.
This problem is in many repositories and there is an easy fix normally by simply reducing the nuget references.
Is it possible that the xunit.assert reference could be removed?
If not, would it be possible to use the xunit.assert.source package instead?
Minimal Repro
Simply install xunit.assert.source and Verify.Xunit package in one project
Submit a PR that fixes the bug
Submit a Pull Request (PR) that fixes the bug. Include in this PR a test that verifies the fix. If you were not able to fix the bug, a PR that illustrates your partial progress will suffice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: