Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] More accurate mocks with hydrated mock #1374

Open
C0ZEN opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1383
Open

[FEATURE] More accurate mocks with hydrated mock #1374

C0ZEN opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1383
Assignees
Labels
dependency-fix Need to wait for a dependency fix feature-request Contains a feature/enhancement request waiting Manual stale. Should have an explicit reason in the comments.
Milestone

Comments

@C0ZEN
Copy link
Member

C0ZEN commented Apr 25, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The mocks created are not creating some fake data when having optionals.

Describe the solution you'd like
Use instead hydrated mocks.

@C0ZEN C0ZEN added the feature-request Contains a feature/enhancement request label Apr 25, 2021
@C0ZEN C0ZEN added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Apr 25, 2021
@C0ZEN C0ZEN self-assigned this Apr 25, 2021
@C0ZEN C0ZEN added this to To do in Sonia features/issues via automation Apr 25, 2021
@C0ZEN C0ZEN added dependency-fix Need to wait for a dependency fix waiting Manual stale. Should have an explicit reason in the comments. labels Apr 25, 2021
@C0ZEN
Copy link
Member Author

C0ZEN commented Apr 25, 2021

Changing the method create huge issues.
I think we need to wait for a fix.
Typescript-TDD/ts-auto-mock#699

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependency-fix Need to wait for a dependency fix feature-request Contains a feature/enhancement request waiting Manual stale. Should have an explicit reason in the comments.
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant